Pros y Contras de codebeamer

That we can configure a lot (even though we cause issues with "messed up configuration" - but that's our fault), browser-based access (even for external partners) Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Loading time of certain pages. No chance of configuring basic functionality. For example, we still desire to have an option to activate the function to open/collapse below the tracker tree below the clicked item again (This feature was removed due to performance issues with some customers, but for us it was very helpful!)

No chance so far to configure the traceability that it shows only the latest test run of test cases and only the test runs of the test case itself instead of test sets. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Admite diferentes metodologías de gestión de proyectos. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Interfaz de usuario difícil de usar, ha alcanzado un punto de inflexión que desanima a los usuarios a seguir utilizándola. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

(experience from 2015-2017)

codeBemaer supports full ALM scope.

End-to-end traceability and configuration capability are impressive.

Many small details save you a lot of time, e.g., test parametrization, re-use of test cases, test steps.

The reporting feature helps you not to miss the project progress and support your management with night letters.

If you are missing something, no problem to write your widget or connect codeBeamer via rest API with your system.

You can do almost everything you need; you can adapt the configuration in every process directly in the codeBemaer GUI.

This tool is really flexible.

The best at the end is that intland is hearing to customer voice. The support team is aloways trying to underrstand your needs.

Many of our ideas has been accepted and implement in new release very quicly.

Beffore implementation of new features, the support team is seeking for a solution and workarround how to support the customer needs.

(by today)

I am still following the ALM market and Intland is really growing and improving the ALM solution. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

(experience from 2015-2017)

The advantage of flexibility and configuration complexity can also be a disadvantage. You need to define the project configuration very thoroughly.

I am missing some integrated features for project planning, including Gantt charts or collaborative/interactive planning.

Also, the support of Google suite will be appreciated.

Our team has been facing an issue of export templates' backward compatibility in the past. CodeBemear solved it by introducing new release management.

We could not assign a floating license to a dedicated project team, but an enterprise contract agreement solved our issue. In the meantime, we wrote a plugin showing which team is using how many floating licenses. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Actualmente, estoy usando CodeBeamer como desarrollador, y mi equipo y yo estamos tratando de crear un marco que podamos usar para diseñar, implementar y manejar proyectos relevantes para ISO26262 y SOTIF, pero he visto que Codebeamer podría usarse para muchos otros propósitos como una herramienta de gestión de requisitos. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

¡Nada hasta ahora! Tal vez no hemos probado toda la profundidad de esta aplicación de software todavía, pero sí, hasta ahora, ¡todo bien! Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Support all kinds of processes, and CB is very configurable to serve all project needs Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates.

Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data).

Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how to collaborate.

It does not seem like Intland is aware of how to manage a product and willing to listen to customer needs. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Encontré CodeBeamer fácil de aprender y usar. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

En cuanto a usar Codebeamer, no recuerdo nada que no me gustara del producto. Mi observación es que puede que no sea tan conocido como un competidor, por lo que el grupo de personas para contratar o trabajar con CodeBeamer puede no ser tan grande. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

I introduced and used codeBeamer already in the second automotive startup company. codeBeamer provides a full ASPICE process capability out of the box. It supports the dynamic growth of your team while keeping you able to fulfill the automotive process requirements without too many manual tasks. It also saves you from the hassles that bigger, and older companies have with their complex mix of self-developed and commercial toolboxes to resemble a comparable ALM solution. And if there is a need for integration with external tools (e.g. customer ticket systems, CI/CD, SWQ tools) the REST API makes it easy to do.

An aspect often overlooked is the integration of SW code repositories. So full traceability from requirements, tasks, user stories to source code lines is there from the start without manual work and external scripting. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

A first-time user is easily overwhelmed by the number of features included in codeBeamer. While I have no idea how to solve that, maybe a beginner/expert view mode would help in the onboarding process of new users by hiding the complex functions at first. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Great Project Management and Requirements Management system in a very responsive user interface.

Its open architecture provides 3rd party integration to Software Configuration Management systems, to other Requirements Management systems, to Test Automation (Jenkins) and Management systems.

Simple Microsoft Excel roundtrip (import/export), super helpful in discussions with local teams and small customer/supplier collaboration.

Fulfills ASPICE, provides out-of-the-box templates (e.g., Automotive, Functional Safety), and most of the features are customizable! Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Filters and initial setup could feel overwhelming - luckily, the templates, help, and support make it easier.

It could be perceived as an overkill, from the perspective of a small team or a department just introduced to Application Lifecycle Management. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Objetos de datos; flujos de trabajo; plantillas; modelo de datos Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Hasta ahora no tengo claro respecto a los casos de negocio de referencia. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Holistic performance of the tool.

Vey much integrated and can be customizable. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.

Expensive.

I am sometimes getting lost with too many trackers and configurations. Reseña recopilada por y alojada en G2.com.