- Inicio
- ...
- Herramientas de Análisis de Desarrollo de Software
- LinearB
- Pluralsight Flow
- LinearB-vs-Pluralsight Flow
Comparar LinearB y Pluralsight Flow 
LinearB vs Pluralsight Flow
Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que LinearB es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. Además, prefirieron hacer negocios en general con LinearB.
- Los revisores consideraron que LinearB satisface mejor las necesidades de su empresa que Pluralsight Flow.
- Al comparar la calidad del soporte continuo del producto, los revisores consideraron que LinearB es la opción preferida.
- En cuanto a actualizaciones de características y hojas de ruta, nuestros revisores prefirieron la dirección de LinearB sobre Pluralsight Flow.
- No se requiere tarjeta de crédito
- Auto incorporación en 5 minutos
- Usuarios ilimitados
- Todos los métricas fundamentales
- Retrospectiva
- Competencia
Me encanta la profundidad y amplitud del análisis de LinearB. Me encantan las métricas de calidad que obtengo. Puedo ver qué proyectos necesitan ayuda, qué están haciendo los equipos y cuán productivos son, y puedo poner mi esfuerzo donde más se necesita...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
Me encanta la profundidad y amplitud del análisis de LinearB. Me encantan las métricas de calidad que obtengo. Puedo ver qué proyectos necesitan ayuda, qué están haciendo los equipos y cuán productivos son, y puedo poner mi esfuerzo donde más se necesita...
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
