Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que Tenable Nessus es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. Sin embargo, prefirieron hacer negocios con HCL AppScan en general.
AppScan's thorough scanning capabilities and CI/CD integration streamline security testing. Detailed reporting aids in prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively.
We can't relay solely on scanner results ,have to depend on manual testing as well
I like the reporting and vulnerability filtering specialitiy according to the worldwide products. For example You can filter the vulnerabilities by type and by exploitability ease.
It cant manage all scans from one location. So doesn't have centralized management. It doesn't provide roles based access. It doesn’t seem to offer long term solutions and the support it is no so fats.
AppScan's thorough scanning capabilities and CI/CD integration streamline security testing. Detailed reporting aids in prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively.
I like the reporting and vulnerability filtering specialitiy according to the worldwide products. For example You can filter the vulnerabilities by type and by exploitability ease.
We can't relay solely on scanner results ,have to depend on manual testing as well
It cant manage all scans from one location. So doesn't have centralized management. It doesn't provide roles based access. It doesn’t seem to offer long term solutions and the support it is no so fats.