Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que CharityTracker es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. También prefirieron hacer negocios con CharityTracker en general.
The ability to create external portals for our clients. Having them complete their paperwork and save it directly to their folders is a time saver.
We are a small nonprofit and used Apricot for several years. It’s effective, but expensive for what you get. We had a minor billing dispute which we had a hard time resolving. We did not renew our contract and Apricot kept billing us. Next thing we had...
CharityTracker es extremadamente fácil de usar y el servicio de atención al cliente es insuperable.
It constantly logs you out while in the middle of inputting information to HMIS.
The ability to create external portals for our clients. Having them complete their paperwork and save it directly to their folders is a time saver.
CharityTracker es extremadamente fácil de usar y el servicio de atención al cliente es insuperable.
We are a small nonprofit and used Apricot for several years. It’s effective, but expensive for what you get. We had a minor billing dispute which we had a hard time resolving. We did not renew our contract and Apricot kept billing us. Next thing we had...
It constantly logs you out while in the middle of inputting information to HMIS.