Comparar Flow y LinearB 
Flow vs LinearB
Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que LinearB es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. También prefirieron hacer negocios con LinearB en general.
- Los revisores consideraron que LinearB satisface mejor las necesidades de su empresa que Flow.
- Al comparar la calidad del soporte continuo del producto, los revisores consideraron que LinearB es la opción preferida.
- En cuanto a actualizaciones de características y hojas de ruta, nuestros revisores prefirieron la dirección de LinearB sobre Flow.
- Todos los métricas fundamentales
- Retrospectiva
- Competencia
- No se requiere tarjeta de crédito
- Auto incorporación en 5 minutos
- Usuarios ilimitados
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
El producto: - El hecho de que analiza nuestro principal bus - git, y también se integra con nuestra plataforma de seguimiento de problemas. - La granularidad personalizada - podemos analizar el rendimiento desde un solo contribuyente, pasando por un equipo...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
El producto: - El hecho de que analiza nuestro principal bus - git, y también se integra con nuestra plataforma de seguimiento de problemas. - La granularidad personalizada - podemos analizar el rendimiento desde un solo contribuyente, pasando por un equipo...
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
