- Inicio
- ...
- Software de reconocimiento de voz
- Amazon Transcribe
- IBM Watson Speech to Text
- Amazon Transcribe-vs-IBM Watson Speech to Text
Comparar Amazon Transcribe y IBM Watson Speech to Text 
Amazon Transcribe vs IBM Watson Speech to Text
Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que IBM Watson Speech to Text es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. Sin embargo, sintieron que ambos proveedores facilitan igualmente hacer negocios en general.
- Los revisores consideraron que Amazon Transcribe satisface mejor las necesidades de su empresa que IBM Watson Speech to Text.
- Al comparar la calidad del soporte continuo del producto, los revisores consideraron que IBM Watson Speech to Text es la opción preferida.
- En cuanto a actualizaciones de características y hojas de ruta, nuestros revisores prefirieron la dirección de Amazon Transcribe sobre IBM Watson Speech to Text.
This is really easy to use, the transcribe time is very short (It is about les than 8 minutes). You can upload you customized vocabulary to make the artificial Intelligence to learn. Other feature that I really really like, is that can transcribe English...
As most speech recognition tools I’ve tried, it has trouble with names, puntuation, and similar words, which demands careful proofreading.
Tiene muy buenas capacidades de traducción de texto a voz.
It just supports 11 languages (atleast when we used it).
This is really easy to use, the transcribe time is very short (It is about les than 8 minutes). You can upload you customized vocabulary to make the artificial Intelligence to learn. Other feature that I really really like, is that can transcribe English...
Tiene muy buenas capacidades de traducción de texto a voz.
As most speech recognition tools I’ve tried, it has trouble with names, puntuation, and similar words, which demands careful proofreading.
It just supports 11 languages (atleast when we used it).
