# Which solution supports AI-powered machine translation with human review?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Looking at data on the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/translation-management">Translation Management</a> category page, the following platforms stand out for teams prioritizing AI-powered machine translation with human review. See below for my top software list. </p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/phrase-localization-platform/reviews"><strong>Phrase Localization Platform</strong></a> – provides AI MT alongside Machine + Human Translation workflows, so linguists can review and post-edit before publishing. Good fit if you want automation plus governed human QA. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/smartling/reviews"><strong>Smartling</strong></a> – positions itself as an AI Translation Platform and supports human translators/reviewers via Smartling Language Services or your own resources—ideal for MT + human-in-the-loop quality control.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/lokalise/reviews"><strong>Lokalise</strong></a> – includes machine translations and reporting on quality; teams commonly run MT with human post-editing in collaborative workflows (screenshots, comments, statuses). </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/crowdin/reviews"><strong>Crowdin</strong></a> – an AI-powered localization platform with workflow, QA, and CAT features that support MT output followed by reviewer checks and approvals. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/transifex/reviews"><strong>Transifex</strong></a> – offers automated/machine translation plus QA and workflow controls so editors can review MT results before release; strong for continuous localization teams.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What do you think? Based on your experiences, are there other options I should consider? I want to know what the G2 community believes is the best option for users. Thanks!</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 9 months ago
- Author title: Content Marketing Specialist
- Net upvotes: 2


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Which tool gave you the best controls for reviewer tiers, approvals, and audit trails, without creating bottlenecks?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 9 months ago
- Author title: Content Marketing Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1




## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4