Tamer S.
TS
Senior IP Network Design Consultant at Rogers Communications

Would you prefer Checkpoint/Palo Alto/Fortigate or other NGFW? and if you'd like to add why?

NGFW competition
2 comments
Looks like you’re not logged in.
Users need to be logged in to answer questions
Log In
TT
Fleet assistant
0
I would prefer Check Point because of database handling. i have seen gateways with 5k+ policies and they working without lag.
Looks like you’re not logged in.
Users need to be logged in to write comments
Log In
Reply
RG
0
It depends on what your needs are. I've worked with both Check Point and Fortinet, and both have a place. In a smaller IT shop (where you may not need some of the advanced NGFW features like sandboxing) Fortinets are good, effective, low-admin cost firewalls. However, if you are in a larger IT shop (Enterprise IT), Check Point and Palo Alto would be more appropriate.
Looks like you’re not logged in.
Users need to be logged in to write comments
Log In
Reply
SM
Sivakuamaran M.
Erweitern/Einklappen Options
Wenn es um den Perimeterschutz geht, sind Checkpoint und Palo die beste Option mit den anfallenden Kosten. Es ist am besten geeignet für Finanz- oder Unternehmensumgebungen. Ich habe früher mit Checkpoint-Firewalls gearbeitet, daher ist meine persönliche Präferenz Checkpoint, aber es erfordert hoch technisches Wissen, um die Einrichtung zu konfigurieren.