Play und Spark Software vergleichen 
Play vs Spark
Bei der Bewertung der beiden Lösungen fanden Rezensenten Spark einfacher zu verwenden, zu verwalten und Geschäfte zu machen. Jedoch bevorzugten Rezensenten die Einrichtung mit Play.
- Die Gutachter waren der Meinung, dass Spark den Bedürfnissen ihres Unternehmens besser entspricht als Play.
- Beim Vergleich der Qualität des laufenden Produktsupports bevorzugten die Gutachter Spark.
- Bei Feature-Updates und Roadmaps bevorzugten unsere Rezensenten die Richtung von Play gegenüber Spark.
You can transcend skill sets by using Play! as an intermediary between having your development team learn a more modern JVM language (Scala) and Java. The framework's power can still very easily be seen using Java methods, and in-fact I personally prefer to...
Wirklich zu klein Es gibt mehr Übereinstimmung Wenige chinesische Ressourcen
Easier to implement in comparison to other methods Better documentations
The client itself seemed to have a bit of limited functionality in comparison to other clients (such as Adium) in terms of logging (locally). I would have simply used Adium solely when connecting to the Jabber server, other than it has *limited* fastpath...
You can transcend skill sets by using Play! as an intermediary between having your development team learn a more modern JVM language (Scala) and Java. The framework's power can still very easily be seen using Java methods, and in-fact I personally prefer to...
Easier to implement in comparison to other methods Better documentations
Wirklich zu klein Es gibt mehr Übereinstimmung Wenige chinesische Ressourcen
The client itself seemed to have a bit of limited functionality in comparison to other clients (such as Adium) in terms of logging (locally). I would have simply used Adium solely when connecting to the Jabber server, other than it has *limited* fastpath...
