Bei der Bewertung der beiden Lösungen fanden Rezensenten Evalato einfacher zu verwenden, einzurichten und zu verwalten. Rezensenten bevorzugten es insgesamt, Geschäfte mit Evalato zu machen.
Evalato uses customized forms for submission of applicant entries hence allowing pricise and accurate information. It also allows for the judging panels to easily communicate and thus enabling transparency in terms of scores and the entire evaluation...
Challenging on backside to assign judges. We had 1 entry above 100 and had to pay $1,000 (euros) more to upgrade the software. Another option should be if you only need to increase the draft submissions by a few. Additionally the cost is based on per draft...
The best aspect of OpenWater is definitely the customer service. There are people who are always on hand to answer any question or issue you might have. In addition, OpenWater is intuitive and easy to use.
There are so many odd UI/UX paths through the system. So many times I have to dig in menus for a commonly used thing. And the overall look is unappealing.
Evalato uses customized forms for submission of applicant entries hence allowing pricise and accurate information. It also allows for the judging panels to easily communicate and thus enabling transparency in terms of scores and the entire evaluation...
The best aspect of OpenWater is definitely the customer service. There are people who are always on hand to answer any question or issue you might have. In addition, OpenWater is intuitive and easy to use.
Challenging on backside to assign judges. We had 1 entry above 100 and had to pay $1,000 (euros) more to upgrade the software. Another option should be if you only need to increase the draft submissions by a few. Additionally the cost is based on per draft...
There are so many odd UI/UX paths through the system. So many times I have to dig in menus for a commonly used thing. And the overall look is unappealing.