Bei der Bewertung der beiden Lösungen fanden Rezensenten CockroachDB einfacher zu verwenden, einzurichten und zu verwalten. Jedoch bevorzugten Rezensenten es insgesamt, Geschäfte mit Fauna zu machen.
Es gibt viele coole Funktionen wie: 1. Live-Cluster-Skalierungsoptionen 2. Geo-Partitionierung 3. Hohe Verfügbarkeit 4. Backup-Optionen 5. Archivierung von Daten 6. Implementierung der Änderungsdatenerfassung 7. Verschiedene Topologien für...
The cockroach db should have been had a better compatibility with the application loadbalancers as well. Although it is used for the networking loadbalancers it has the downside of not routing on the app layer
The scaling options provided by fauna DB for the given pricing are very insightful and cheap compared to other options available in the market with similar features.
Not available on on-premis where still lots of healthcare and insurance companies are having huge clusters on -premis. Perhaps this can be looked into to acquire more customers.
Es gibt viele coole Funktionen wie: 1. Live-Cluster-Skalierungsoptionen 2. Geo-Partitionierung 3. Hohe Verfügbarkeit 4. Backup-Optionen 5. Archivierung von Daten 6. Implementierung der Änderungsdatenerfassung 7. Verschiedene Topologien für...
The scaling options provided by fauna DB for the given pricing are very insightful and cheap compared to other options available in the market with similar features.
The cockroach db should have been had a better compatibility with the application loadbalancers as well. Although it is used for the networking loadbalancers it has the downside of not routing on the app layer
Not available on on-premis where still lots of healthcare and insurance companies are having huge clusters on -premis. Perhaps this can be looked into to acquire more customers.