Bei der Bewertung der beiden Lösungen fanden die Rezensenten Froala Editor einfacher zu verwenden, einzurichten und zu verwalten. Allerdings bevorzugten die Rezensenten es, insgesamt Geschäfte mit CKEditor zu machen.
Integrating CKEditor into our product was a breeze. Probably took 0.01% of the time it'd take for us to implement it ourselves. It has tons of features out of the box and is easy to customize. Works with HTML great.
I'm not a fan of the toolbar. It's visible now, but it's always visible when the user scrolls the page down. And it gets annoying. The editor content is now placed inline in the page (without the surrounding <iframe> element) — it's harder to style.
Der Editor selbst scheint ein anständiges Produkt zu sein. Wir haben einen Blog auf einem benutzerdefinierten CMS. Anstatt ein Texteingabefeld zu verwenden, dachten wir, wir würden einen Editor verwenden. Froala funktioniert gut für diesen Anwendungsfall,...
Support never meets the deadline. They don't even have the courtesy to inform customers if there is a delay. They will give vague answers like "it will be released in some time".
Integrating CKEditor into our product was a breeze. Probably took 0.01% of the time it'd take for us to implement it ourselves. It has tons of features out of the box and is easy to customize. Works with HTML great.
Der Editor selbst scheint ein anständiges Produkt zu sein. Wir haben einen Blog auf einem benutzerdefinierten CMS. Anstatt ein Texteingabefeld zu verwenden, dachten wir, wir würden einen Editor verwenden. Froala funktioniert gut für diesen Anwendungsfall,...
I'm not a fan of the toolbar. It's visible now, but it's always visible when the user scrolls the page down. And it gets annoying. The editor content is now placed inline in the page (without the surrounding <iframe> element) — it's harder to style.
Support never meets the deadline. They don't even have the courtesy to inform customers if there is a delay. They will give vague answers like "it will be released in some time".