Compare Wordsmith and textengine.io 
- Users report that both Wordsmith and textengine.io have a solid star rating of 4.4, indicating a high level of satisfaction among users, particularly in the small-business segment where Wordsmith has a slight edge with 68.8% of reviews coming from this market compared to textengine.io's 60.0%.
- Reviewers mention that Wordsmith excels in ease of setup with a score of 6.3, while textengine.io does not provide a score in this area, suggesting that Wordsmith may offer a more straightforward onboarding experience.
- G2 users highlight that Wordsmith has a higher quality of support rating at 8.8 compared to textengine.io's 8.4, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when using Wordsmith.
- Users on G2 report that Wordsmith shines in tailored content generation with a score of 8.5, while textengine.io's capabilities in this area are not as strong, suggesting that Wordsmith may provide more personalized content options.
- Reviewers mention that both products have a strong focus on generative AI, with Wordsmith scoring 8.3 in AI text generation, which users say enhances their content creation process, while textengine.io's performance in this area is not specified.
- Users say that Wordsmith's customizable models score 8.3, allowing for greater flexibility in content generation, whereas textengine.io's capabilities in this regard are less clear, potentially limiting user customization options.
The user interface is beyond easy to use, while remaining very much user friendly. It creates reports that truly sound 'human like', so it comes off legible but saves our organization time from doing it themselves. Having a tool that can translate data...
It requires a lot of work at the beginning to enter in the data. It can be very time consuming
I like the automatic text generator feature most because it saves our most of the time. And very useful to create SEO friendly content using textengine.io. And it also generates unique content everytime.
I dislike about textengine.io is that it might not be the best choice if you want to create content in very specific or personalised way.
The user interface is beyond easy to use, while remaining very much user friendly. It creates reports that truly sound 'human like', so it comes off legible but saves our organization time from doing it themselves. Having a tool that can translate data...
I like the automatic text generator feature most because it saves our most of the time. And very useful to create SEO friendly content using textengine.io. And it also generates unique content everytime.
It requires a lot of work at the beginning to enter in the data. It can be very time consuming
I dislike about textengine.io is that it might not be the best choice if you want to create content in very specific or personalised way.
