Compare TestLink and TestLodge 
- Users report that TestLink excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring an impressive 8.7, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases, while TestLodge, although strong, does not match this level of functionality.
- Reviewers mention that TestLodge shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.2, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a quick implementation, whereas TestLink's score of 7.5 indicates a more complex setup process.
- G2 users highlight the Quality of Support for TestLodge, which received a score of 9.2, suggesting that users feel well-supported and valued, while TestLink's score of 8.1 indicates room for improvement in customer service responsiveness.
- Users on G2 report that TestLodge offers superior Ease of Use with a score of 8.5, making it more user-friendly for teams without extensive technical expertise, compared to TestLink's score of 7.8, which suggests a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that TestLink's Integration capabilities, scoring 7.8, are somewhat limited compared to TestLodge, which is often praised for its seamless integration with various tools, enhancing workflow efficiency.
- Users say that TestLodge's Management features, particularly in Reporting with a score of 8.5, provide clear insights and analytics, while TestLink's score of 8.4 indicates it may not offer the same level of detailed reporting capabilities.
- 200 Test cases
- 100 Test runs
- Unlimited Users & Test suites
The platform is browser based and works on local environments, the web based application is fast and reliable, the test case folders are easily manageable and can be linked to test requirements, defects can be linked to to specific test case and that...
- Maintainibility is hard - Difficult to update the TCs while execution - Integration with Automation is hard - Poor UI
Started by the technical support team is quite good where they have gotten me out of trouble several times very quickly. You have several templates to manage the tests where it saves me a lot of time and I can have detailed reports to capture failures or...
The platform is browser based and works on local environments, the web based application is fast and reliable, the test case folders are easily manageable and can be linked to test requirements, defects can be linked to to specific test case and that...
Started by the technical support team is quite good where they have gotten me out of trouble several times very quickly. You have several templates to manage the tests where it saves me a lot of time and I can have detailed reports to capture failures or...
- Maintainibility is hard - Difficult to update the TCs while execution - Integration with Automation is hard - Poor UI
