Compare ScyllaDB and YugabyteDB 
- Users report that ScyllaDB excels in performance analysis with a score of 8.9, while YugabyteDB follows closely with 8.6. Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's integrated cache significantly enhances query response times, making it a preferred choice for high-throughput applications.
- Reviewers mention that YugabyteDB shines in quality of support, scoring 9.3 compared to ScyllaDB's 8.3. Users on G2 highlight the responsiveness and helpfulness of YugabyteDB's support team, which is crucial for businesses needing quick resolutions.
- Users say that both products have strong data replication capabilities, with ScyllaDB scoring 8.6 and YugabyteDB leading with 9.0. Reviewers mention that YugabyteDB's multi-region replication feature is particularly beneficial for global applications, ensuring low-latency access.
- G2 users report that ScyllaDB has a slight edge in scalability with a score of 9.2, while YugabyteDB scores 8.7. Users mention that ScyllaDB's auto-sharding feature allows for seamless scaling as data grows, making it ideal for rapidly expanding businesses.
- Users on G2 highlight that YugabyteDB offers superior database monitoring with a score of 9.4, compared to ScyllaDB's 8.8. Reviewers mention that the monitoring tools in YugabyteDB provide detailed insights into performance metrics, which helps in proactive management.
- Reviewers mention that both products have robust security features, but YugabyteDB scores higher at 8.7 compared to ScyllaDB's 8.2. Users report that YugabyteDB's role-based authorization and data encryption features are particularly well-received, providing peace of mind for sensitive data management.
One of the best things about ScyllaDB is its simplicity to use. We can split the DB into multiple shards to have the resiliency in place. We shifted from another NoSQL solution to ScyllaDB due to it's self-healing and advance caching technology which is...
The pricing, the pricing, the pricing! Open is missing too many features for us to make it viable, the paid tier is just too much cost to justify. Used at my previous company, my current won't consider because of this. Lower requirements than some others.
Ease access to information and cloud providing security
Limited Community Support: While YugabyteDB is gaining popularity, it still has a smaller community compared to other popular databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL. This means that it may be more difficult to find answers to specific questions or get help from...
One of the best things about ScyllaDB is its simplicity to use. We can split the DB into multiple shards to have the resiliency in place. We shifted from another NoSQL solution to ScyllaDB due to it's self-healing and advance caching technology which is...
Ease access to information and cloud providing security
The pricing, the pricing, the pricing! Open is missing too many features for us to make it viable, the paid tier is just too much cost to justify. Used at my previous company, my current won't consider because of this. Lower requirements than some others.
Limited Community Support: While YugabyteDB is gaining popularity, it still has a smaller community compared to other popular databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL. This means that it may be more difficult to find answers to specific questions or get help from...
