Compare ReadCube and Zotero 
- Users report that Zotero excels in its ease of setup, scoring 9.5, which reviewers mention makes it a great choice for those who want to quickly start organizing their research without a steep learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that ReadCube offers superior quality of support, with a score of 8.8, indicating that users feel more supported when they encounter issues or need assistance compared to Zotero's score of 7.9.
- G2 users highlight that Zotero has a strong performance in meeting requirements, achieving a score of 9.1, which suggests it effectively fulfills the needs of researchers looking for a comprehensive reference management tool.
- Users on G2 report that ReadCube shines in its ease of administration, scoring 9.4, which reviewers say makes it particularly appealing for teams or organizations managing multiple users and projects.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have the same star rating of 4.4, ReadCube has a larger number of reviews (168) compared to Zotero (96), suggesting a broader user base and potentially more diverse feedback on its features.
- Users say that Zotero's product direction score of 7.6 indicates some concerns about future updates and features, while ReadCube's score of 8.4 suggests a more positive outlook on ongoing development and enhancements.
- Search & Download: Built-in search engines. Personalized recommendations. Related article feeds. Institutional proxy support. Web importing via browser. 1-click PDF downloads. Advanced search filters.
- Stay Organized: Easy importing tools from your desktop/other reference managers. Auto article meta-data matching. Full text library search. Advanced sorted & filtering. Manual & Smart Lists. #keyword tagging, labels & article ratings.
- Read & Annotate: Enhanced PDF viewing. Hyperlinked inline references, high-res figure browsers & auto-fetched supplements. Advanced article metrics (incl. citations, field & relative citation ratio, and Altmetric) Inline and sticky notes, highlighting and drawing tools. Text to speech tool.
Easy to use interface that is intuitive, not buggy, google chrome extension works nearly 100% of the time, smoothly and quickly, very little time wasted troubleshooting. Love the left-hand menu that allows perusal of figures while reading.
Every single aspect of the app is markedly worse than the original Papers App, ranging from the mark-up features, to the lack of narrating functionality, to just reading documents in the app. Just to take two examples: If I highlight a something in a...
Back in college I used Zotero for everything. Its seamless Firefox integration and later integration with Word were exactly what I needed, and unlike EndNote, I could install it on all my own devices with no trouble and no fees. I now use it very...
I think Zotero can make their interface more efficient by changing the way they present their features. Also every time you want to change the style of your references on a document or more it feels like it ruins everything else.
Easy to use interface that is intuitive, not buggy, google chrome extension works nearly 100% of the time, smoothly and quickly, very little time wasted troubleshooting. Love the left-hand menu that allows perusal of figures while reading.
Back in college I used Zotero for everything. Its seamless Firefox integration and later integration with Word were exactly what I needed, and unlike EndNote, I could install it on all my own devices with no trouble and no fees. I now use it very...
Every single aspect of the app is markedly worse than the original Papers App, ranging from the mark-up features, to the lack of narrating functionality, to just reading documents in the app. Just to take two examples: If I highlight a something in a...
I think Zotero can make their interface more efficient by changing the way they present their features. Also every time you want to change the style of your references on a document or more it feels like it ruins everything else.
