Compare Rafflecopter and Woobox 
- Users report that Woobox has a more user-friendly interface, with an Ease of Use score of 8.3 compared to Rafflecopter's 8.5, making it slightly easier for beginners to navigate.
- Reviewers mention that Rafflecopter excels in campaign creation, particularly with its Builder feature, which scored 8.3, while Woobox's Builder only received a score of 6.9, indicating a more robust design experience with Rafflecopter.
- G2 users highlight that Rafflecopter offers superior data collection capabilities, with a Form score of 9.3 and Analytics at 8.8, compared to Woobox's scores of 7.5 and 6.9, respectively, making it a better choice for those focused on lead generation.
- Users on G2 report that Woobox provides a wider variety of promotion options, scoring 7.3 in Promotion Variety, while Rafflecopter also scored 8.3, indicating both platforms offer diverse promotional tools, but Woobox may have a slight edge in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Rafflecopter's efficiency in distribution is notable, with a score of 9.0 in Email distribution, while Woobox only scored 6.3, suggesting that Rafflecopter is more effective for email marketing campaigns.
- Users say that while both platforms have similar support quality, with Woobox at 7.9 and Rafflecopter also at 7.9, the overall user experience and product direction seem to favor Woobox slightly, as it scored 7.2 compared to Rafflecopter's 6.5, indicating a more positive outlook on future developments.
- Participant Limit 5,000; UNLIMITED when paid yearly
- Fan Limit 20,000; 50,000 when paid yearly
- Businesses: 1 Brand Page
It is inexpensive and easy to set up. It seems to be the number one tool book marketers use for promotions so readers are comfortable seeing and interacting with it,
On my credit card statement, this only showed as "Basic" – no company name. It caused us to not notice we were paying for an unwanted service for countless months. I can only assume it is absolutely intentional on their part to not list Rafflecopter. Also,...
Easy to use, inexpensive. Able to get it up and running quickly for clients.
The documentation is very lacking. It would be great if they had a series of tutorials that help you understand all the contest types and how to take advantage of their customisation options. Additionally they haven't updated the user interface in years....
It is inexpensive and easy to set up. It seems to be the number one tool book marketers use for promotions so readers are comfortable seeing and interacting with it,
Easy to use, inexpensive. Able to get it up and running quickly for clients.
On my credit card statement, this only showed as "Basic" – no company name. It caused us to not notice we were paying for an unwanted service for countless months. I can only assume it is absolutely intentional on their part to not list Rafflecopter. Also,...
The documentation is very lacking. It would be great if they had a series of tutorials that help you understand all the contest types and how to take advantage of their customisation options. Additionally they haven't updated the user interface in years....
