Compare PureBasic and Visual Studio Code 
- Users report that PureBasic excels in its ease of use with a score of 9.7, making it a favorite among beginners who appreciate its straightforward interface, while Visual Studio Code, with a score of 9.2, is also user-friendly but may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features.
- Reviewers mention that Visual Studio Code shines in its syntax highlighting capabilities, scoring 9.5, which enhances code readability significantly, whereas PureBasic's syntax highlighting received a lower score of 8.0, indicating room for improvement in this area.
- G2 users highlight that PureBasic offers strong extensibility with a score of 9.3, allowing users to easily add new features, while Visual Studio Code, although it has a robust plugin ecosystem, scored 8.0 in this category, suggesting that its extensibility may not be as seamless for some users.
- Users on G2 report that Visual Studio Code's collaborative editing feature, scoring 8.6, is beneficial for team projects, but PureBasic's score of 9.0 indicates it may provide a more effective collaborative experience for certain workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Visual Studio Code's plugins and integrations scored 9.3, making it a versatile choice for developers looking to enhance their workflow with various tools, while PureBasic's lower score of 8.0 suggests it may not offer as many integration options.
- Users say that both products have strong security features, with PureBasic scoring 8.9 and Visual Studio Code slightly higher at 9.0, indicating that both are reliable choices for developers concerned about security in their coding environments.
Some of PureBasic's best features are that it is cross-platform ( Windows, Linux and Macintosh ), easily extended by creating libraries, the compiler is fast and creates highly optimized executables with small footprints. I also find that the user...
The graphical interface builder that comes with the IDE leaves a lot to be desired. There are free third party GUI editing tools that work much better than PureBasic's built in one. Overall, if your software solution needs a GUI, you're better using...
1. The simple and intuitive user interface 2. Available on all the platforms i.e. Linux, Windows, MacOS 3. Plethora of extensions are available in the marketplace and you can download it in one-click 4. It has an integrated terminal so that you can run your...
Extremely limited features with respect to standard and hugely popular IDES like Visual Studio Lack of Project Structures and project Templates made enterprise-wide application development very difficult.
Some of PureBasic's best features are that it is cross-platform ( Windows, Linux and Macintosh ), easily extended by creating libraries, the compiler is fast and creates highly optimized executables with small footprints. I also find that the user...
1. The simple and intuitive user interface 2. Available on all the platforms i.e. Linux, Windows, MacOS 3. Plethora of extensions are available in the marketplace and you can download it in one-click 4. It has an integrated terminal so that you can run your...
The graphical interface builder that comes with the IDE leaves a lot to be desired. There are free third party GUI editing tools that work much better than PureBasic's built in one. Overall, if your software solution needs a GUI, you're better using...
Extremely limited features with respect to standard and hugely popular IDES like Visual Studio Lack of Project Structures and project Templates made enterprise-wide application development very difficult.
