Compare Proxmox VE and XenServer 
- Users report that XenServer excels in scalability with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to expand their virtual environments efficiently. In contrast, Proxmox VE, while still capable, does not match this level of scalability.
- Reviewers mention that XenServer's OS integration is outstanding, scoring 9.6, which allows for seamless operation with various operating systems. Proxmox VE, although it offers good OS support, does not achieve the same level of integration, which can be a drawback for users needing extensive compatibility.
- G2 users highlight that XenServer's resource-saving capabilities are impressive, scoring 9.2, which helps organizations optimize their hardware usage. Proxmox VE, while effective, does not provide the same level of resource efficiency, leading to potential higher operational costs.
- Users on G2 report that XenServer's performance management features are robust, scoring 9.4, allowing for detailed monitoring and optimization of virtual resources. Proxmox VE's performance management is adequate but lacks some advanced features that XenServer offers, which can limit fine-tuning capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for XenServer is rated at 8.1, which is higher than Proxmox VE's 7.0. This difference indicates that users may find more reliable assistance and resources when using XenServer, which can be crucial for troubleshooting and maintenance.
- Users say that while Proxmox VE has a strong entry-level price point at €4.99 per month per CPU, XenServer's pricing structure may be more favorable for larger enterprises due to its scalability and resource management features, making it a better long-term investment despite the initial costs.
- Access to Enterprise repository
- Support via community forum
The features I like best right now are: ZFS usability - Storage flexibility options Clustering - one to as many servers as you need for your scalable infrastructure Using hardware passthrough Light weight OS Flexibility, install on old and new...
This hypervisor offer free resources that are in other paid hypervisors, like live migration, live storage migration, openvswitch with vxlans. It is compatible with cloud orchestrators like CloudStack and OpenStack. It supports paravirtualization, but...
Very unrealible for my users. Sometimes they can connect sometimes they can't . Network and equipment are well above minimum requirments but still have major issues
The features I like best right now are: ZFS usability - Storage flexibility options Clustering - one to as many servers as you need for your scalable infrastructure Using hardware passthrough Light weight OS Flexibility, install on old and new...
This hypervisor offer free resources that are in other paid hypervisors, like live migration, live storage migration, openvswitch with vxlans. It is compatible with cloud orchestrators like CloudStack and OpenStack. It supports paravirtualization, but...
Very unrealible for my users. Sometimes they can connect sometimes they can't . Network and equipment are well above minimum requirments but still have major issues
