Compare ProtoPie and UXPin 
- Users report that UXPin excels in ease of use with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize a user-friendly interface, while ProtoPie has a lower score of 7.1, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that UXPin offers superior ease of setup with a score of 9.2, allowing users to get started quickly without extensive configuration, whereas ProtoPie lacks a specific score in this area, suggesting potential challenges in initial setup.
- G2 users highlight that UXPin's quality of support is rated at 8.5, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while ProtoPie, with a score of 8.3, is noted for good support but not as consistently praised as UXPin.
- Users on G2 report that UXPin provides robust collaboration capabilities, which is essential for teams working together on design projects, while ProtoPie is noted for its collaboration software integration, but some users feel it could be more seamless.
- Reviewers say that UXPin shines in its asset performance and template usage, allowing for efficient design processes, while ProtoPie is recognized for its unique interactive prototyping features, which some users find particularly beneficial for testing user interactions.
- Users report that UXPin's educational resources are comprehensive, helping new users to quickly learn the platform, whereas ProtoPie, while offering some resources, is seen as lacking in depth compared to UXPin's extensive support materials.
- High-fidelity prototyping features
- 2 prototypes, saved in Cloud
- 2 interaction recordings
- 2 active prototypes
- Interactions & animations
- States
ProtoPie is super simple to pick up, and allows me to create super realistic prototypes, which helps with stakeholders and user-testing.
• Significant lack of parity when importing from Figma • Component libraries are very buggy with antiquated management and have never worked correctly • The desktop app’s cloud integration was done halfway with poor ability to manage and find files • No...
- HTML based design with states and CSS interactions. This is the future of design. No longer do you need to create 5 different art boards to describe one interaction. Just create a component with multiple states. It's easy. It's awesome. - The way your...
In practice, UXPin doesn't simplify a process, just offers a different route. If you want to utilize the bootstrap (or any other framework) you have to be intimately knowledgeable about said framework. The work flow didn't speed anything up for me, and I...
ProtoPie is super simple to pick up, and allows me to create super realistic prototypes, which helps with stakeholders and user-testing.
- HTML based design with states and CSS interactions. This is the future of design. No longer do you need to create 5 different art boards to describe one interaction. Just create a component with multiple states. It's easy. It's awesome. - The way your...
• Significant lack of parity when importing from Figma • Component libraries are very buggy with antiquated management and have never worked correctly • The desktop app’s cloud integration was done halfway with poor ability to manage and find files • No...
In practice, UXPin doesn't simplify a process, just offers a different route. If you want to utilize the bootstrap (or any other framework) you have to be intimately knowledgeable about said framework. The work flow didn't speed anything up for me, and I...
