Compare Play and spring.io 
- Users report that spring.io excels in Application Deployment with a score of 9.3, highlighting its seamless integration with cloud services, while Play does not provide the same level of deployment flexibility, scoring lower in this area.
- Reviewers mention that spring.io offers superior Development Tools with a score of 9.0, particularly praising its comprehensive support for microservices architecture, whereas Play has received mixed feedback on its development tools, scoring lower at 7.4.
- G2 users indicate that spring.io shines in Testing capabilities, achieving a score of 9.3, with users appreciating its robust testing framework that simplifies unit and integration testing, while Play falls short with a score of 7.5, lacking some advanced testing features.
- Users on G2 report that spring.io provides excellent Database Management with a score of 9.3, particularly noting its support for various databases and ease of integration, while Play has a lower score of 7.0, with users mentioning challenges in database connectivity.
- Reviewers say that spring.io has a strong focus on Security, scoring 8.7, with features like built-in security protocols and regular updates, while Play has received criticism for its security measures, scoring only 7.5.
- Users report that spring.io is highly rated for Ease of Use with a score of 8.5, with many finding its documentation and community support helpful, whereas Play has a lower score of 7.4, with some users mentioning a steeper learning curve.
You can transcend skill sets by using Play! as an intermediary between having your development team learn a more modern JVM language (Scala) and Java. The framework's power can still very easily be seen using Java methods, and in-fact I personally prefer to...
Really too small There is more agreement Few Chinese resources
It really helps me focus on my business features instead of worrying about configuration, boilerplate code and thinks like those. It can be integrated with almost any technology I usually use: relational database, mongoDB, redis, JMS, etc... Moreover...
At this point, it's not really relevant. The practices, RAD nature and speed ups for Spring have been incorporated in Spring Boot and JHipster. You can now do similar RAD development with other Spring tools. ROO also has that proprietary wirings that...
You can transcend skill sets by using Play! as an intermediary between having your development team learn a more modern JVM language (Scala) and Java. The framework's power can still very easily be seen using Java methods, and in-fact I personally prefer to...
It really helps me focus on my business features instead of worrying about configuration, boilerplate code and thinks like those. It can be integrated with almost any technology I usually use: relational database, mongoDB, redis, JMS, etc... Moreover...
Really too small There is more agreement Few Chinese resources
At this point, it's not really relevant. The practices, RAD nature and speed ups for Spring have been incorporated in Spring Boot and JHipster. You can now do similar RAD development with other Spring tools. ROO also has that proprietary wirings that...
