Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Parasoft Jtest and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest
Star Rating
(13)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Parasoft Jtest
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Star Rating
(90)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, providing comprehensive insights into code quality, while Parasoft Jtest, although strong, scores slightly lower in this area, indicating that SonarQube may offer more robust analysis features.
  • Reviewers mention that Parasoft Jtest shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.1, making it more user-friendly for teams new to code quality tools, whereas SonarQube Server has a lower score of 8.3, suggesting a steeper learning curve for some users.
  • G2 users highlight that SonarQube Server's Documentation is rated at 7.7, which some find lacking in depth, while Parasoft Jtest's documentation is perceived as more comprehensive, contributing to its higher overall satisfaction in user support.
  • Users on G2 report that Parasoft Jtest has a superior Quality of Support rating of 9.1, indicating that users feel more supported and valued, compared to SonarQube Server's score of 8.0, which may leave some users wanting more responsive assistance.
  • Reviewers mention that SonarQube Server's Integration with Development Tools is rated at 7.7, which some users find adequate, but Parasoft Jtest's integration capabilities are noted to be more seamless, enhancing workflow efficiency for development teams.
  • Users say that SonarQube Server's Productivity Updates score of 8.3 reflects its commitment to continuous improvement, while Parasoft Jtest, with a lower score, may not deliver updates as frequently, potentially impacting long-term user satisfaction.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Parasoft Jtest
No pricing available
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Community Edition
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
Parasoft Jtest
No trial information available
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
8
8.7
77
Ease of Use
9.1
9
8.3
79
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.8
50
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
46
Quality of Support
9.1
9
8.0
62
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
40
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
5
8.0
74
Features by Category
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
7.5
194
Administration
Not enough data
7.7
14
Not enough data
6.3
15
Analysis
Not enough data
7.6
16
Not enough data
8.2
15
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
17
Testing
Not enough data
7.2
13
Not enough data
6.3
14
Not enough data
6.3
16
Not enough data
7.1
13
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
6.6
16
Software Development Analytics ToolsHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
7.9
127
Functionality
Not enough data
7.8
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.3
22
Management
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.6
18
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.6
150
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.4
26
Not enough data
8.2
27
Security
Not enough data
6.8
24
Not enough data
7.5
23
Not enough data
8.0
24
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)Hide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Parasoft Jtest and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) are categorized as Static Code Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest is categorized as Peer Code Review
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is categorized as Software Development Analytics Tools and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
38.5%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
43.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest
Computer Software
38.5%
Telecommunications
7.7%
Retail
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Other
30.8%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Computer Software
23.6%
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Financial Services
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Other
37.1%
Most Helpful Reviews
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Computer Software

Automation, time saving, easy end to end testing, reusable, increase in productivity

Most Helpful Critical Review
Hiéracles A.
HA
Hiéracles A.
Verified User in Insurance

I like so much of the tool, I don't have negative comment's.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Stanley S.
SS
Stanley S.
Verified User in Medical Devices

Our development process is helped alot by SonarQube as it will detect some bugs such as running out of memory, or simple error that we might not see at the first time. Our team is happy to use the product.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Medical Devices

My experience as a SonarSource customer shows that they manifest little interest in small customers. In addition, their quality policy is poor when it comes to fixing major bugs in their code. For instance, this ticket has now been open for 1 year without...

Alternatives
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Add Bitbucket
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Add Microsoft Defender for Cloud
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Alternatives
Embold
Embold
Add Embold
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
Discussions
Parasoft Jtest
Parasoft Jtest Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Parasoft Jtest has no discussions with answers
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has no discussions with answers