Compare Paligo and RWS Tridion Docs 
- Powerful single-sourcing
- Topic-based Authoring
- Translation management
The first characteristic of Paligo that most users notice is that it is cloud-based, which allows all users to work from their computer (Mac or PC) and browser of choice. Authors, contributors, and reviewers don't need to install anything to use Paligo,...
I don't like a single part of it. From the inflexible text editor, the poorly explained features, the poorly focused on-boarding, and more. The system doesn't really incorporate the user experience as much as the feature capabilities. Where the idea that...
A lot of options to work with. Components, Component Templates etc.
Repetitive/bulk tasks are excessively laborious. Overall UX is poor. Proprietary features (variables and conditions) can be 'gotchas'. Flexibility can easily lead to complexity, where content is tangled up and full of land mines. You can create PDFs or HTML...
The first characteristic of Paligo that most users notice is that it is cloud-based, which allows all users to work from their computer (Mac or PC) and browser of choice. Authors, contributors, and reviewers don't need to install anything to use Paligo,...
A lot of options to work with. Components, Component Templates etc.
I don't like a single part of it. From the inflexible text editor, the poorly explained features, the poorly focused on-boarding, and more. The system doesn't really incorporate the user experience as much as the feature capabilities. Where the idea that...
Repetitive/bulk tasks are excessively laborious. Overall UX is poor. Proprietary features (variables and conditions) can be 'gotchas'. Flexibility can easily lead to complexity, where content is tangled up and full of land mines. You can create PDFs or HTML...
