- Home
- ...
- Software Testing Tools
- OpenText Application Quality Management
- SpiraTeam
- OpenText Application Quality Management-vs-SpiraTeam
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and SpiraTeam 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (62.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $171.99 3 Concurrent users Per Month
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSpiraTeam
Star Rating
(32)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (62.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $171.99 3 Concurrent users Per Month
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which reviewers mention allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results, making it a strong choice for large enterprises.
- Reviewers mention that SpiraTeam shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.4, highlighting its intuitive interface and user-friendly design, which users on G2 say significantly reduces the learning curve for new team members.
- G2 users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a robust Bug Reporting feature, particularly in Tester Reports & Feedback, scoring 9.1, which reviewers say provides detailed insights into testing outcomes and issues, essential for large-scale projects.
- Users say that SpiraTeam's Quality of Support is notably high at 8.8, with reviewers mentioning that the responsive customer service and extensive documentation make it easier to resolve issues quickly compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center, which scored 7.7.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Product Direction score of 6.8 indicates some concerns about future updates and enhancements, while SpiraTeam's score of 8.3 suggests a more positive outlook on ongoing development and feature additions.
- Users on G2 report that SpiraTeam's Automation features, particularly in Automated Creation & Testing, score 8.8, which reviewers say enhances efficiency by streamlining repetitive tasks, a feature that OpenText ALM Quality Center lacks in comparison.
Featured Products
Sponsored
DocSheets
(1)
Bug Tracking
Visit Website
Sponsored
Visure Requirements
(6)
Bug Tracking
Visit Website
Sponsored
Testiny
(12)
Bug Tracking
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableSpiraTeam
SpiraTeam - 3 User Saas Edition
Starting at $171.99
3 Concurrent users Per Month
$57.33 per concurrent user per month, billed monthly;
$1,857.49 per year per 3 concurrent users, billed annually.
- Includes the software, hosting and support;
- Unlimited support for 1 year from date of purchase;
- 100% money back guarantee.
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableSpiraTeam
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.3
26
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.4
26
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.4
17
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.5
11
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.8
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.9
11
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.3
27
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Communication
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Procedural
Not enough data
8.8
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and SpiraTeam are categorized as Requirements Management and ALM Software
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Continuous Testing Platforms, Test Management, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
SpiraTeam has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SpiraTeam
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Computer Software
20.7%
Internet
13.8%
Telecommunications
6.9%
Consumer Goods
6.9%
Other
31.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
OpenText Application Quality Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Banking
nothing major to dislike. we use HP QC which is still not upto the mark in terms of user friendly and customization.
SpiraTeam
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Easy to use and understand. Teams are quickly and easily trained to use the tool effectively. The transparency of each element of the tool and their inter-relationships is highly valuable from a management and communications perspective. It readily...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Kamal B.
Verified User in Internet
a defect created, cannot be attached with more than one script. Due to this user do not get insight that what impact defect has on scripts.
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Easy to use and understand. Teams are quickly and easily trained to use the tool effectively. The transparency of each element of the tool and their inter-relationships is highly valuable from a management and communications perspective. It readily...
Verified User in Banking
nothing major to dislike. we use HP QC which is still not upto the mark in terms of user friendly and customization.
Kamal B.
Verified User in Internet
a defect created, cannot be attached with more than one script. Due to this user do not get insight that what impact defect has on scripts.
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
SpiraTeam has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
