- Home
- ...
- Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Software
- Nucleus
- Tenable Security Center
- Nucleus-vs-Tenable Security Center
Compare Nucleus and Tenable Security Center 
- Users report that Tenable Security Center excels in Vulnerability Scanning with a score of 9.6, highlighting its comprehensive scanning capabilities that help identify potential threats effectively. In contrast, Nucleus received a lower score of 8.9, indicating it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Tenable's Automated Scans feature is highly rated at 9.1, making it easier for teams to schedule and execute scans without manual intervention. Nucleus, while scoring well at 8.8, does not offer the same level of automation, which could lead to increased manual workload.
- G2 users highlight Tenable's superior Risk Scoring feature with a score of 9.1, which provides detailed insights into vulnerabilities. Users on G2 note that Nucleus, with a score of 8.8, offers risk scoring but lacks the depth and clarity found in Tenable's reporting.
- Reviewers mention that Nucleus shines in Workflow Automation, scoring 8.9, which helps streamline processes and improve efficiency. In comparison, Tenable's score of 7.7 indicates that its workflow automation features may not be as advanced or user-friendly.
- Users say that Tenable Security Center's Quality of Support is rated at 8.4, with many reviewers appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Nucleus, however, received a higher score of 8.7, suggesting that users may find its support services more satisfactory.
- Users report that Tenable's Contextual Data feature, scoring 9.3, provides valuable insights that enhance vulnerability management. In contrast, Nucleus's score of 8.5 indicates that while it offers contextual data, it may not be as comprehensive or actionable as Tenable's.
- Asset & Vulnerability Inventory
- Contextual Threat Enrichment
- Analyst Workbench
The data is very indexed through multiple indexes (axis) making it easy for everyone involved to find their details in a manner that is useful to them. The initial learning curve on how data is organized can take a moment to learn, but once understood is...
It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....
Tenable.sc gives a solution and reports on risk based vulnerabilities management and provides report vulnerabilities of each and every device connected to the network. It prioritize the assets according to their risk score.
could be more descriptive about the vulnerabiltiies.
The data is very indexed through multiple indexes (axis) making it easy for everyone involved to find their details in a manner that is useful to them. The initial learning curve on how data is organized can take a moment to learn, but once understood is...
Tenable.sc gives a solution and reports on risk based vulnerabilities management and provides report vulnerabilities of each and every device connected to the network. It prioritize the assets according to their risk score.
It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....
could be more descriptive about the vulnerabiltiies.
