Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Midjourney and TESS AI 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Anima
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Vyond
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Zencoder.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (86.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Midjourney
Star Rating
(94)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MidjourneyTESS AI
Star Rating
(477)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (86.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TESS AISummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Pareto excels in Ease of Use with a score of 9.0, making it more user-friendly compared to Midjourney's score of 8.0. Reviewers mention that the intuitive interface allows for quicker onboarding and less time spent on training.
- Reviewers mention that Pareto's Quality of Support is superior, scoring 8.7 against Midjourney's 7.6. Users on G2 appreciate the responsive customer service and comprehensive documentation that Pareto offers, which helps resolve issues more efficiently.
- G2 users highlight Pareto's Video Editing Capabilities with a score of 8.3, significantly outperforming Midjourney's disappointing score of 4.9. Reviewers say that the robust editing tools in Pareto allow for more creative control over video content.
- Users say that Pareto's Grammar Check feature is highly effective, scoring 9.2, while Midjourney lacks this specific functionality. Reviewers mention that this feature is crucial for content creators who prioritize polished text output.
- Reviewers mention that Pareto's Image Generation Algorithms score of 9.0 is a standout feature, providing high-quality outputs, whereas Midjourney's score of 8.3 indicates room for improvement. Users report that the realism and detail in images generated by Pareto are particularly impressive.
- Users on G2 report that Pareto's Customization options, scoring 8.8, allow for a more tailored experience compared to Midjourney's score of 8.2. Reviewers say that the ability to adjust settings and preferences enhances their overall satisfaction with the software.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Midjourney
No pricing availableTESS AI
No pricing availableFree Trial
Midjourney
No trial information availableTESS AI
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
85
8.8
339
Ease of Use
7.9
87
8.9
352
Ease of Setup
8.6
19
8.9
230
Ease of Admin
7.5
10
8.8
124
Quality of Support
7.8
59
8.8
292
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
8
8.7
125
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
85
9.6
351
Features by Category
Core Conversational Capabilities - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Data
Not enough data
8.7
105
Not enough data
8.8
107
Interaction
Not enough data
8.7
107
Not enough data
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.8
108
Not enough data
8.7
107
Task & Flow Management - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Learning
Not enough data
8.6
106
Not enough data
8.1
105
Deployment & Embedding - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Content Generation
Not enough data
8.8
105
Not enough data
8.7
104
Admin & Configuration - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
7.8
6
System
Not enough data
8.1
105
Not enough data
8.4
105
Not enough data
8.5
102
Not enough data
8.4
103
Agentic AI - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.2
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Monitoring & Improvement - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reliability & Safety - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
Not enough data
Grammar
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
8.8
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Formatting
Not enough data
8.2
96
Not enough data
8.5
96
Not enough data
8.5
96
Content
Not enough data
8.8
95
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.7
93
Product Type
Not enough data
8.4
92
Not enough data
7.2
90
Generative AI
Not enough data
9.3
83
Not enough data
9.2
84
Integration
Not enough data
8.4
107
Not enough data
8.3
108
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Speech Output
Not enough data
8.6
104
Not enough data
8.4
102
Not enough data
8.4
103
Not enough data
8.4
102
Not enough data
8.2
102
Not enough data
8.2
102
Not enough data
8.4
102
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audio Format
Not enough data
8.4
101
Not enough data
8.3
99
Not enough data
8.4
97
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.9
67
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audio
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Video
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Image
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Text
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
92
Not enough data
8.8
91
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.6
92
Support
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.4
89
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.0
15
Image Generation
8.4
55
8.7
226
9.0
64
8.5
225
8.3
64
8.5
222
8.4
61
8.5
219
9.0
63
8.7
219
Advanced Functionality
8.5
60
8.6
213
7.2
56
8.0
215
7.8
48
8.5
208
9.2
65
8.8
215
Model
8.4
53
8.7
209
8.8
60
8.6
209
8.4
48
8.5
202
Commercial Rights & Licensing - AI Image Generators
Not enough data
Not enough data
License Type Transparency - AI Image Generators
Not enough data
Not enough data
Video Creation - AI Video Generation
Not enough data
8.1
94
Not enough data
8.2
92
Not enough data
7.8
93
Not enough data
8.5
92
Not enough data
7.9
92
Not enough data
8.0
91
Generative AI - AI Video Generation
Not enough data
8.0
70
Editing - AI Video Generation
Not enough data
7.9
94
Not enough data
8.3
93
Storage & Management - AI Video Generation
Not enough data
8.6
93
Not enough data
8.4
91
Not enough data
8.2
93
Not enough data
8.2
95
Workflow Design & Integration - AI Orchestration
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization & Analytics - AI Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Governance & Compliance Controls - AI Orchestration
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Midjourney and TESS AI are categorized as AI Image Generators
Unique Categories
Midjourney has no unique categories
TESS AI is categorized as AI Code Generation, Text to Speech, AI Video Generators, AI Chatbots, AI Writing Assistant, and AI Orchestration
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Midjourney
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TESS AI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.1%
Computer Software
10.8%
Marketing and Advertising
9.7%
Graphic Design
9.7%
Consulting
4.3%
Other
50.5%
Marketing and Advertising
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
6.5%
Computer Software
5.1%
Graphic Design
4.3%
Animation
4.3%
Other
63.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Midjourney has no discussions with answers
TESS AI has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
