Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Invicti (formerly Netsparker) and Metasploit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Star Rating
(68)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Invicti (formerly Netsparker)Metasploit
Star Rating
(55)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MetasploitSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Metasploit excels in its Command-Line Tools with a score of 9.2, making it a favorite for users who prefer scripting and automation in penetration testing. In contrast, Invicti (formerly Netsparker) has a lower score of 8.8 in this area, indicating it may not be as robust for command-line enthusiasts.
- Reviewers mention that Invicti shines in Vulnerability Scanning, achieving a score of 9.6, which is significantly higher than Metasploit's score of 8.7. This suggests that Invicti provides more comprehensive and accurate vulnerability assessments, making it a preferred choice for users focused on web application security.
- G2 users highlight that Invicti's Ease of Use is rated at 9.1, compared to Metasploit's 8.0. This indicates that Invicti may be more user-friendly, especially for those who are new to security testing tools, allowing for quicker onboarding and productivity.
- Users on G2 report that Metasploit's False Positives score of 7.8 is a concern, as it may lead to unnecessary remediation efforts. In contrast, Invicti's higher score in this area suggests it has better accuracy in identifying genuine vulnerabilities, which is crucial for effective security management.
- Reviewers mention that Invicti's Reporting and Analytics capabilities, with a score of 8.8, are superior to Metasploit's score of 7.6. This feature is essential for users who need detailed insights and actionable reports to communicate findings to stakeholders.
- Users say that Invicti's Quality of Support is rated at 9.2, which is higher than Metasploit's 8.1. This suggests that users may find more responsive and helpful customer support with Invicti, enhancing their overall experience with the product.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
No pricing availableMetasploit
No pricing availableFree Trial
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
No trial information availableMetasploit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
58
8.9
42
Ease of Use
9.1
58
8.1
42
Ease of Setup
9.1
48
7.8
22
Ease of Admin
9.2
46
8.3
20
Quality of Support
8.9
58
8.2
36
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
44
8.7
17
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
54
9.1
38
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
18
Not enough data
9.5
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
Threat Protection
7.9
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Administration
8.1
13
8.5
9
8.3
13
8.1
13
9.0
17
7.7
14
Analysis
8.4
15
8.1
12
9.0
17
8.6
17
9.7
17
8.7
19
Testing
7.6
12
9.1
20
8.6
15
8.3
21
8.9
17
8.0
16
9.3
17
8.4
19
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Analysis
8.9
28
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
Testing
7.1
19
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
Performance
8.6
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Network
8.7
14
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
Application
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.2
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Security Testing
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Invicti (formerly Netsparker) and Metasploit are categorized as Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Invicti (formerly Netsparker) is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Website Security, API Security, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, Software Composition Analysis, Static Code Analysis, Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Metasploit has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Metasploit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
12.5%
Telecommunications
10.9%
Financial Services
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
7.8%
Internet
6.3%
Other
53.1%
Computer & Network Security
34.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Computer Software
7.5%
Security and Investigations
3.8%
Financial Services
3.8%
Other
28.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the difference between Netsparker Desktop and Netsparker Cloud?
1 Comment
Official Response from Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
To start off with, as the name implies, Netsparker Cloud is an online web application security scanner and Netsparker Desktop is a Windows software scanner....Read more
What is a Scan Policy?
1 Comment
Official Response from Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Scan policies in Netsparker allow you to save a specific Netsparker configuration setup so you do not have to configure the scanner each time you scan a...Read more
What are the different vulnerability severities in Netsparker?
1 Comment
Official Response from Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Netsparker web application security scanner scans for a wide variety of vulnerabilities in websites, web applications and web services.
Each vulnerability...Read more
How do I get Premium License for free to make tests for local FinTech & Universities and education?
2 Comments
HF
The best way to pass in Isaca CRISC Exams provided by exactinside.
Visit Page: https://www.exactinside.com/CRISC-exactdumps.html Read more
<>?:"{}!@#$%^&*()_+ I like that Rapid7 provides the required number of characters.
1 Comment
AL
test2<%= 7*7 %> x *{7*7}Read more
Metasploit has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
