Compare Meshmixer and Slic3r 
- Users report that Slic3r excels in its standalone slicing capabilities, with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize slicing efficiency. In contrast, Meshmixer's standalone slicing feature received a lower score of 6.9, indicating it may not be as robust for dedicated slicing tasks.
- Reviewers mention that Slic3r offers superior STL compatibility with a score of 9.8, which is crucial for many users in the 3D printing community. Meshmixer, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.6, suggesting it may not handle STL files as seamlessly as Slic3r.
- Users on G2 highlight that Meshmixer shines in integrated 3D modeling, scoring 7.4, which allows for more creative design adjustments. Slic3r, with a score of 6.2 in this area, may not provide the same level of modeling flexibility, making Meshmixer a better option for users focused on design.
- G2 users report that both products have similar ease of use ratings at 8.2, indicating that both Slic3r and Meshmixer are user-friendly. However, users mention that Slic3r's interface is more intuitive for slicing tasks, while Meshmixer's interface can be more complex due to its additional modeling features.
- Reviewers say that Slic3r's mesh repair feature is highly effective, scoring 9.0, which is essential for ensuring print quality. Meshmixer's mesh repair feature scored slightly higher at 9.1, but users note that Slic3r's repair tools are more straightforward to use for beginners.
- Users report that both products have strong file editing capabilities, but Meshmixer outperforms Slic3r with a score of 8.1 compared to Slic3r's 6.3. This suggests that users looking for advanced editing features may find Meshmixer more suitable for their needs.
It provides with a very easy to use interface and provides tools which are really helpful for 3D printing. It also provides facility for 3D scan. Also it provides good support for file editing like Mesh repair. The best tool that they provide is the support...
The shaders are pretty limited in their variety. Most of 3D printing nowadays involve printing with multiple materials. The tool is limited in being able to view the models. Further, support for voxel based models are needed for the industry going forward
Slic3r was easy to navigate as a new user. It was also easy to find tutorials online.
There are several things that I don't like about Slic3r. One of them is the tools that are not so necessary for the correct customization of the user. Also the viewer and editor of 3D pieces is very slow, it does not have much utility since there are...
It provides with a very easy to use interface and provides tools which are really helpful for 3D printing. It also provides facility for 3D scan. Also it provides good support for file editing like Mesh repair. The best tool that they provide is the support...
Slic3r was easy to navigate as a new user. It was also easy to find tutorials online.
The shaders are pretty limited in their variety. Most of 3D printing nowadays involve printing with multiple materials. The tool is limited in being able to view the models. Further, support for voxel based models are needed for the industry going forward
There are several things that I don't like about Slic3r. One of them is the tools that are not so necessary for the correct customization of the user. Also the viewer and editor of 3D pieces is very slow, it does not have much utility since there are...
