Compare Mend.io and Snyk 
- Users report that Mend.io excels in Security Auditing with a score of 9.0, indicating a robust capability in identifying vulnerabilities, while Snyk's score of 8.3 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Mend.io's Secrets Management feature scores 8.3, which is significantly higher than Snyk's 6.5, highlighting Mend.io's strength in managing sensitive information securely.
- G2 users note that Snyk offers superior Static Code Analysis with a score of 8.5 compared to Mend.io's 8.2, suggesting that Snyk may provide more thorough insights into code vulnerabilities.
- Users on G2 report that Mend.io's Automated Scans feature is highly effective, scoring 9.1, which may lead to faster detection of issues compared to Snyk's performance in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Snyk's Compliance Testing feature is rated at 8.1, slightly outperforming Mend.io's 8.1, indicating that both products are on par, but Snyk may have a slight edge in this critical area.
- Users say that Mend.io's Remediation Suggestions feature scores 8.2, which is higher than Snyk's 7.8, suggesting that Mend.io may provide more actionable insights for fixing vulnerabilities.
- 200 Open Source tests per month
- 100 Container tests per month
- 300 IaC tests per month
Really impressed with their service, and the response time when an unknown library needed resolution. Very detailed information for most of the open source dependencies. Dependency version history and their vulnerabilities have been helpful. UI and...
Most usability issues. The tool just doesn't do the workflow that would be optimal in my opinion. The components seem disjointed, the user interface is a bit clunky and it's quite difficult to identify necessary actions once an issue has been identified....
GitLab and GitHub integration, rejects pull/merge requests if vulnerable code introduced, recommends remediation steps.
Customer support is slow to respond, usually not helpful and ended up escalating to a developer, that's when we lost all contact and did not get a solution to a clear bug that prevents us from using the product. Another really important note around SBOM,...
Really impressed with their service, and the response time when an unknown library needed resolution. Very detailed information for most of the open source dependencies. Dependency version history and their vulnerabilities have been helpful. UI and...
GitLab and GitHub integration, rejects pull/merge requests if vulnerable code introduced, recommends remediation steps.
Most usability issues. The tool just doesn't do the workflow that would be optimal in my opinion. The components seem disjointed, the user interface is a bit clunky and it's quite difficult to identify necessary actions once an issue has been identified....
Customer support is slow to respond, usually not helpful and ended up escalating to a developer, that's when we lost all contact and did not get a solution to a clear bug that prevents us from using the product. Another really important note around SBOM,...
