Compare Mageia and openSUSE Leap 
- Users report that openSUSE Leap excels in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize a straightforward installation process. In contrast, Mageia's setup experience is less favorable, with users mentioning a more complex installation that can be daunting for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that openSUSE Leap has superior "Quality of Support," scoring 7.5, which is significantly higher than Mageia's 6.3. Users appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team in openSUSE, while Mageia users report longer wait times and less effective assistance.
- G2 users highlight that openSUSE Leap has a better "Meets Requirements" score of 8.9 compared to Mageia's 7.8. This indicates that openSUSE is more likely to fulfill user needs effectively, with reviewers noting its robust package management and software availability as key strengths.
- Users on G2 report that openSUSE Leap shines in "Ease of Admin" with a score of 8.8, making system administration tasks more manageable. In contrast, Mageia users mention that administrative tasks can be cumbersome and less intuitive, leading to frustration.
- Reviewers say that openSUSE Leap's "Product Direction" score of 7.3 reflects a clear roadmap and ongoing improvements, while Mageia's higher score of 9.1 indicates a strong community-driven development approach that some users find appealing, though it may lack the structured updates seen in openSUSE.
- Users report that openSUSE Leap's "Memory Management" features are more efficient, allowing for better performance on systems with limited resources. In comparison, Mageia users mention occasional slowdowns and less effective memory handling, particularly in resource-intensive applications.
I like the possibilities and more open options, I like the system management and the actual network sharing that the system offers as well
The post-installation configuration is somewhat slow, and you have to do the entire time zone and language before viewing the desktop, but it works. It has some things to improve, such as performance since it consumes a lot of CPU and with few applications...
There is a lot of documentation available. openSUSE is Stable and you can use it for servers and workstations, It takes a bit more time to get used to than you may have to with a Linux Mint for instance. After you have installed it and you have the most...
It would need to be updated and a little more, that's the only bad thing.
I like the possibilities and more open options, I like the system management and the actual network sharing that the system offers as well
There is a lot of documentation available. openSUSE is Stable and you can use it for servers and workstations, It takes a bit more time to get used to than you may have to with a Linux Mint for instance. After you have installed it and you have the most...
The post-installation configuration is somewhat slow, and you have to do the entire time zone and language before viewing the desktop, but it works. It has some things to improve, such as performance since it consumes a lot of CPU and with few applications...
It would need to be updated and a little more, that's the only bad thing.
