Compare LinearB and Swarmia 
- Users report that LinearB excels in its Quality of Support, scoring 9.5, which reviewers mention as a significant advantage when needing assistance, while Swarmia, with a score of 9.1, is noted for being helpful but not as responsive.
- Reviewers mention that LinearB's Repository Integration is highly rated at 9.0, providing seamless connections with various repositories, whereas Swarmia shines even brighter with a score of 9.4, indicating a more robust integration experience.
- G2 users highlight that LinearB's Impact Predictions feature, scoring 8.6, offers valuable insights into project outcomes, while Swarmia's lower score of 6.6 suggests that users find its predictions less reliable.
- Users on G2 report that LinearB's Planning Tools are effective, scoring 8.1, but Swarmia's score of 6.8 indicates that its planning capabilities may not meet user expectations as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar scores for Ease of Use at 8.9, but users say that LinearB's interface feels more intuitive, making it easier for teams to adopt quickly.
- Users report that LinearB's Historical Data Consolidation feature, with a score of 8.7, is praised for its ability to provide comprehensive insights over time, while Swarmia's score of 8.6 suggests it offers similar functionality but with less depth.
- No credit card required
- 5-minute self-onboard
- Upgrade any time
- GitHub insights
- Issue tracker insights
- Slack notifications
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
PR/Contribution metrics dsahboard for across all organisation repos. Slack integration.
The investiment balance from Linear is not working, not enough filter options, does not get the estimations from linear, too centric on github.
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
PR/Contribution metrics dsahboard for across all organisation repos. Slack integration.
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
The investiment balance from Linear is not working, not enough filter options, does not get the estimations from linear, too centric on github.
