Compare LibreOffice Base and MySQL 
- Users report that MySQL excels in data schema management with a score of 9.0, allowing for complex database structures, while LibreOffice Base falls short in this area, making it less suitable for intricate data relationships.
- Reviewers mention that MySQL's query language is robust, scoring 9.2, which enables advanced querying capabilities, whereas LibreOffice Base's query functionality is more limited, impacting users who require sophisticated data retrieval.
- G2 users highlight MySQL's strong performance in data replication with a score of 8.8, which is crucial for businesses needing reliable data backup and recovery solutions, while LibreOffice Base lacks this feature, making it less reliable for critical data management.
- Users on G2 appreciate MySQL's high ratings in security features, particularly in access control (9.0) and database locking (8.9), ensuring data integrity and protection, whereas LibreOffice Base's security measures are perceived as weaker, raising concerns for sensitive data handling.
- Reviewers say that MySQL's disaster recovery capabilities score 8.3, providing peace of mind for businesses, while LibreOffice Base does not offer comparable disaster recovery options, which could be a significant drawback for users prioritizing data safety.
- Users report that MySQL's scalability (8.1) is a strong point, allowing businesses to grow without performance issues, while LibreOffice Base struggles with scalability, making it less ideal for organizations anticipating rapid growth.
It's an ideal solution for everyday jobs, and for people requiring an easy-to-understand, simple-to-use system: data is stored right inside the Base file, and you also get native support for dBase flat files. Base provides wizards to help users who are new...
1. Not good for huge data management. 2. The management for database us not so good.
MySql simply works and works well. It is exactly as described: a robust, relational DB which scales nicely to 100s of millions of rows. Plus, many web developers are familiar with using it so there is no shortage of expertise available. If you are doing...
It's out of date and the interface is old. It's not often user-friendly. Very clunky and unintuitive. I wish there was more to it than there is.
It's an ideal solution for everyday jobs, and for people requiring an easy-to-understand, simple-to-use system: data is stored right inside the Base file, and you also get native support for dBase flat files. Base provides wizards to help users who are new...
MySql simply works and works well. It is exactly as described: a robust, relational DB which scales nicely to 100s of millions of rows. Plus, many web developers are familiar with using it so there is no shortage of expertise available. If you are doing...
1. Not good for huge data management. 2. The management for database us not so good.
It's out of date and the interface is old. It's not often user-friendly. Very clunky and unintuitive. I wish there was more to it than there is.
