Compare Jellyfish and LinearB 
- Users report that Jellyfish excels in its Quality of Support with a score of 9.2, while LinearB also performs well at 9.5, indicating that both products are reliable partners, but LinearB may offer slightly superior support responsiveness.
- Reviewers mention that Jellyfish's Repository Integration scores 8.5, which is lower than LinearB's 9.0, suggesting that LinearB provides a more seamless integration experience with version control systems, enhancing workflow efficiency.
- G2 users highlight that Jellyfish's Report Generation feature scores 8.2, which is notably higher than LinearB's 7.6. This indicates that Jellyfish may offer more robust reporting capabilities, allowing users to generate insightful reports more effectively.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar scores for Productivity Updates at 8.5, but reviewers mention that Jellyfish's updates are more user-friendly, making it easier for teams to stay informed about project progress.
- Reviewers say that Jellyfish's Historical Data Consolidation feature scores 8.3, while LinearB's is slightly better at 8.7. This suggests that LinearB may provide a more comprehensive view of historical data, which can be crucial for long-term project analysis.
- Users say that LinearB shines in Communication Tools with a score of 8.2 compared to Jellyfish's 7.1, indicating that LinearB may offer better features for team collaboration and communication, which is essential for agile development environments.
- No credit card required
- 5-minute self-onboard
- Upgrade any time
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
I love the depth and breadth of LinearB's analysis. I love the quality metrics that I get. I can see what projects need help, what teams are doing and how productive they are, and I can put my effort where it is most needed using the tools they...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
I love the depth and breadth of LinearB's analysis. I love the quality metrics that I get. I can see what projects need help, what teams are doing and how productive they are, and I can put my effort where it is most needed using the tools they...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
