G2 reviewers report that Jama Connect excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to OpenText Application Quality Management. Users appreciate the intuitive interface and ease of use, which helps new users get up to speed quickly.
According to verified reviews, OpenText Application Quality Management provides a comprehensive solution for managing the software development life cycle, with features for requirements gathering, defect logging, and tracking processes effectively. However, it struggles to match the user experience and flexibility offered by Jama Connect.
Users say that Jama Connect's live traceability feature and review center for requirements are standout functionalities that enhance collaboration and clarity in requirements management. This level of detail is often highlighted as a key advantage over OpenText's offerings.
Reviewers mention that while OpenText Application Quality Management is convenient and covers all aspects of the development process, it may not be as user-friendly as Jama Connect, which is praised for its powerful modification capabilities and linking of items.
G2 reviewers highlight the quality of support provided by Jama Connect, noting its responsiveness and helpfulness, which contributes to a better overall user experience compared to OpenText, where users have expressed some concerns about support quality.
According to recent user feedback, Jama Connect's robust user interface and ease of setup make it a preferred choice for many, while OpenText Application Quality Management, despite its comprehensive features, may require more effort to configure and adapt to specific workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jama Connect for Requirements Management
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
166
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.3
169
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
7.8
116
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.1
102
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.6
156
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.