- Home
- ...
- ALM Software
- codebeamer
- Jama Connect for Requirements Management
- codebeamer-vs-Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Compare Jama Connect for Requirements Management and codebeamer 
- Users report that codebeamer excels in its centralized information management, scoring 8.8 compared to Jama Connect's 9.0, which reviewers mention as a key feature for maintaining a single source of truth for requirements.
- Reviewers mention that Jama Connect offers superior stakeholder communication capabilities, with a score of 8.3, while codebeamer's score of 7.8 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- G2 users highlight codebeamer's strong traceability features, scoring 8.7, which allows for better tracking of requirements throughout the project lifecycle, whereas Jama Connect also performs well with a score of 8.9.
- Users on G2 report that codebeamer's ease of setup is slightly lower at 7.6 compared to Jama Connect's 7.8, suggesting that Jama Connect may provide a more user-friendly onboarding experience.
- Reviewers say that both products have similar quality of support ratings, with codebeamer at 8.3 and Jama Connect at 8.5, indicating that users generally find both platforms responsive and helpful.
- Users report that codebeamer's automated creation and testing features score 7.6, which some reviewers feel could be enhanced, while Jama Connect's score of 7.5 suggests that both products have opportunities for improvement in this area.
I like the freedom to store my documentation, requirements, risks, tests, and defects all in the same place. This, combined with Jama's great tools for review and collaboration, make Jama an ideal tool to use for large teams and cross-functional activities.
It's not easy to search, it doesn't really correlate test cases to requirements that well. Can never figure out how to switch between related projects. And, if you want a report to come out of it, you can't. A PDF of test cases or requirements in a...
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
I like the freedom to store my documentation, requirements, risks, tests, and defects all in the same place. This, combined with Jama's great tools for review and collaboration, make Jama an ideal tool to use for large teams and cross-functional activities.
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
It's not easy to search, it doesn't really correlate test cases to requirements that well. Can never figure out how to switch between related projects. And, if you want a report to come out of it, you can't. A PDF of test cases or requirements in a...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
