Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Interbase and Microsoft SQL Server

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Interbase
Interbase
Star Rating
(11)3.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Interbase
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Star Rating
(2,212)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft SQL Server
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Microsoft SQL Server excels in its Query Language with a score of 9.2, making it easier for developers to write complex queries efficiently. In contrast, Interbase, while functional, does not match this level of performance, leading to some frustration among users.
  • Reviewers mention that Microsoft SQL Server's Data Replication feature, rated at 8.8, is robust and reliable, allowing for seamless data synchronization across multiple databases. Interbase, however, has received lower ratings in this area, which can hinder users who require consistent data availability.
  • G2 users highlight the superior Backup and Recovery capabilities of Microsoft SQL Server, scoring 9.0, which provides peace of mind for businesses concerned about data loss. Users on G2 have noted that Interbase's backup options are less comprehensive, leading to potential risks during data recovery scenarios.
  • Reviewers say that Microsoft SQL Server's Performance Analysis tools, rated at 8.9, offer in-depth insights into database performance, helping users optimize their systems effectively. In comparison, Interbase's performance analysis features are seen as lacking, which can leave users without critical performance metrics.
  • Users report that Microsoft SQL Server provides excellent User Access Control with a score of 9.1, allowing for detailed permissions management. Interbase's access control features, while functional, do not offer the same level of granularity, which can be a drawback for organizations with strict security requirements.
  • Reviewers mention that Microsoft SQL Server's Data Migration process, rated at 9.0, is user-friendly and well-documented, making transitions smoother for businesses. Conversely, users have expressed challenges with Interbase's migration tools, indicating a steeper learning curve and potential for errors during the process.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Interbase
No pricing available
Microsoft SQL Server
No pricing available
Free Trial
Interbase
No trial information available
Microsoft SQL Server
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.0
5
9.0
1,811
Ease of Use
7.3
5
8.6
1,825
Ease of Setup
8.0
5
8.1
946
Ease of Admin
6.3
5
8.3
925
Quality of Support
Not enough data
8.3
1,606
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.4
876
Product Direction (% positive)
Not enough data
8.3
1,781
Features by Category
Database Management Systems (DBMS)Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
Not enough data
9.0
1,292
Management
Not enough data
8.9
128
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.2
133
Not enough data
8.9
128
Not enough data
8.9
130
Maintenance
Not enough data
9.0
128
Not enough data
9.0
133
Not enough data
9.0
129
Security
Not enough data
8.9
127
Not enough data
9.1
129
Not enough data
8.9
10,576
Management
Not enough data
9.1
114
Not enough data
9.2
115
Not enough data
8.8
101
Not enough data
8.8
107
Support
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
9.1
113
Not enough data
8.7
108
Not enough data
8.6
112
Security
Not enough data
8.9
112
Not enough data
9.1
112
Not enough data
8.8
109
Not enough data
9.0
112
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
109
Not enough data
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.7
112
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.8
111
Database Features
Not enough data
8.9
1247
Not enough data
9.0
1252
Not enough data
8.9
1260
Not enough data
8.7
1226
Not enough data
8.8
1228
Not enough data
8.8
1235
Not enough data
9.1
1255
Big Data Processing and DistributionHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
Not enough data
8.4
442
Database
Not enough data
8.7
49
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.4
47
Integrations
Not enough data
7.9
38
Not enough data
8.3
38
Platform
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.3
38
Processing
Not enough data
8.5
45
Not enough data
8.4
48
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Interbase
Interbase
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Interbase and Microsoft SQL Server are categorized as Relational Databases and Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Unique Categories
Interbase
Interbase has no unique categories
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server is categorized as Big Data Processing and Distribution and On-Premise Data Integration
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Interbase
Interbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
60.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
20.0%
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
18.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
45.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Interbase
Interbase
Logistics and Supply Chain
20.0%
Research
10.0%
Oil & Energy
10.0%
Mining & Metals
10.0%
Medical Practice
10.0%
Other
40.0%
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Information Technology and Services
24.0%
Computer Software
13.8%
Hospital & Health Care
5.5%
Financial Services
4.1%
Higher Education
2.9%
Other
49.7%
Most Helpful Reviews
Interbase
Interbase
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Automotive

out put of sql query that we can use as a table

Most Helpful Critical Review
Anil Kumar P.
AP
Anil Kumar P.
Verified User in Logistics and Supply Chain

Most mathematical operations don't support. Rebuilding of index takes a lot of time. Big size. When records get deleted, size doesn't reduce, we have to extra operation like back and restore to resize the db.

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Elizabeth G.
EG
Elizabeth G.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

For my use cases, microsoft sql has been pretty cooperative.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Banking

processing time seems to be high in my opinion. It can be reduced to make it more useful for handling large data in a timely manner.

Alternatives
Interbase
Interbase Alternatives
MySQL
MySQL
Add MySQL
Oracle Database
Oracle Database
Add Oracle Database
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Add PostgreSQL
SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud
Add SAP HANA Cloud
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server Alternatives
Teradata Vantage
Teradata Vantage
Add Teradata Vantage
SAP HANA Cloud
SAP HANA Cloud
Add SAP HANA Cloud
Google Cloud SQL
Cloud SQL
Add Google Cloud SQL
Snowflake
Snowflake
Add Snowflake
Discussions
Interbase
Interbase Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Interbase has no discussions with answers
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server Discussions
How could I make much easier the experience with the order of my database?
4 comments
Afolabi F.
AF
You can create different tables with your employee information eg employee table, employee roles etc. Then you can create a single view that will pull data...Read more
What is the best way to save your queries?
4 comments
CA
I recommend that you use the saved querys in plain text or .sql or txt format you can use the same sql server query creator or a notepad +++ tool, they are...Read more
How can I work on the same query if the connection is lost (timeout) and then I reconnect?
4 comments
JE
When this happens to me in SQL Server Management Studio, I just have to type USE {your database name here} and then select only that statement and execute...Read more