Compare IBM MQ and RabbitMQ 
- Users report that IBM MQ excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 9.0, while RabbitMQ follows with a score of 8.6, indicating that IBM MQ may be better suited for applications requiring robust message queuing capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that IBM MQ offers superior cloud-based messaging support, scoring 8.4 compared to RabbitMQ's 7.8, which suggests that IBM MQ may provide a more seamless experience for cloud integrations.
- G2 users highlight that IBM MQ has a slightly lower ease of setup score (8.1) compared to RabbitMQ (8.3), indicating that RabbitMQ might be easier for new users to implement and configure.
- Users on G2 report that IBM MQ has a stronger focus on enterprise-level features, as evidenced by its larger market segment presence (63.5% of reviews), while RabbitMQ is more favored by small businesses (37.8% of reviews), suggesting different target audiences for each product.
- Reviewers mention that IBM MQ's disaster recovery capabilities score 7.9, which is a critical feature for enterprises, while RabbitMQ does not have a comparable score, indicating that IBM MQ may be a more reliable choice for businesses that prioritize data recovery.
- Users say that IBM MQ's security monitoring features score higher (8.5) than RabbitMQ's (8.2), suggesting that IBM MQ may provide more robust security measures, which is essential for organizations handling sensitive data.
MQ and message queuing is not the most sexy of applications. Few will have a need for it, but when you do, you'll realise how critical this can be. If you build a system that needs to support hundreds/thousands of transactions per hour, the biggest worry is...
The interface is not the most user friendly and at times is hard to navigate
RabbitMQ is a message broker queing server. It store the message and help our application to work asynchronously. We can configure it in many different way as per the requirements like direct exchange will connect directly to queue, topic exchange for...
Even though ut supports multiple messaging protocols, there were several situations were I faced issue on queuing.
MQ and message queuing is not the most sexy of applications. Few will have a need for it, but when you do, you'll realise how critical this can be. If you build a system that needs to support hundreds/thousands of transactions per hour, the biggest worry is...
RabbitMQ is a message broker queing server. It store the message and help our application to work asynchronously. We can configure it in many different way as per the requirements like direct exchange will connect directly to queue, topic exchange for...
The interface is not the most user friendly and at times is hard to navigate
Even though ut supports multiple messaging protocols, there were several situations were I faced issue on queuing.
