Compare IBM Informix and MySQL 
- Users report that MySQL excels in ease of use with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for small businesses, while IBM Informix shines in ease of administration with a higher score of 9.4, indicating a more streamlined management experience for enterprise users.
- Reviewers mention that MySQL's disaster recovery features score an impressive 9.7, highlighting its robust backup and restoration capabilities, whereas IBM Informix also performs well with a score of 9.2, but users note that its advanced indexing capabilities (9.6) significantly enhance performance during recovery processes.
- G2 users indicate that MySQL's data replication feature scores 8.8, which is solid but falls short compared to IBM Informix's outstanding score of 9.8, suggesting that Informix offers superior options for maintaining data consistency across multiple locations.
- Users on G2 highlight that MySQL's query language is rated at 9.2, which is user-friendly, but IBM Informix's query optimizer (9.8) is noted for its efficiency in handling complex queries, making it a better choice for users with demanding data processing needs.
- Reviewers say that MySQL's overall product direction is rated at 8.0, indicating some concerns about future updates, while IBM Informix's lower score of 6.0 suggests that users are less confident in its roadmap, which could impact long-term investment decisions.
- Users report that MySQL's documentation is rated highly at 9.4, providing comprehensive guidance, whereas IBM Informix's documentation, while adequate, does not receive the same level of praise, which may affect new users' onboarding experience.
To explain what I like best, I am going to refer to two aspects: A) NoSQL vs RDBMS and B) Freeware and Licensed Engines A) Distributed data is based on replication, and data partitioning lets you not only to scale your overall performance up, but also...
Although I have not installed a version 12 and above, installation was a little odd from time to time. It's serious software so it needs to be done correctly but IBM could do a better job there. SQL support can also be a little more up to date. The big...
MySql simply works and works well. It is exactly as described: a robust, relational DB which scales nicely to 100s of millions of rows. Plus, many web developers are familiar with using it so there is no shortage of expertise available. If you are doing...
It doesnt support nested queries. It doesnt have an easy way to archive the tables or partition them easily Scaling can get tricky
To explain what I like best, I am going to refer to two aspects: A) NoSQL vs RDBMS and B) Freeware and Licensed Engines A) Distributed data is based on replication, and data partitioning lets you not only to scale your overall performance up, but also...
MySql simply works and works well. It is exactly as described: a robust, relational DB which scales nicely to 100s of millions of rows. Plus, many web developers are familiar with using it so there is no shortage of expertise available. If you are doing...
Although I have not installed a version 12 and above, installation was a little odd from time to time. It's serious software so it needs to be done correctly but IBM could do a better job there. SQL support can also be a little more up to date. The big...
It doesnt support nested queries. It doesnt have an easy way to archive the tables or partition them easily Scaling can get tricky
