- Home
- ...
- ALM Software
- codebeamer
- IBM Engineering Workflow Management
- codebeamer-vs-IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management and codebeamer 
- Users report that codebeamer excels in ease of use with a score of 8.0, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management lags behind at 6.8, making codebeamer a more user-friendly option for teams looking to adopt new software quickly.
- Reviewers mention that codebeamer's centralized information feature scores an impressive 8.8, allowing teams to access and manage project data efficiently, whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 7.1 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- G2 users highlight codebeamer's strong traceability capabilities with a score of 8.7, which is crucial for compliance and project tracking, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's lower score suggests it may not provide the same level of visibility into project changes.
- Users on G2 appreciate codebeamer's automated creation and testing features, scoring 7.6, which streamline development processes, whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management's lower score indicates that users may find its automation capabilities less effective.
- Reviewers say that codebeamer has been a good partner in business with a score of 8.6, reflecting strong customer satisfaction, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 7.6 suggests that users may not feel as supported in their business relationship.
- Users report that codebeamer's product direction is viewed positively at 8.4, indicating confidence in its future development, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management's score of 8.1, although decent, shows slightly less enthusiasm from its user base regarding its roadmap.
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
you can start with RTC in 1 day - basic installation very simple, no need administration for "out of the box" use. Web interface and Eclipse plug-in - you can choose what you like more or use both. Many integrations with other popular tools (GIT, Jenkins,...
Feels too complicated, can't truly customize down/remove some fields you don't want
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
you can start with RTC in 1 day - basic installation very simple, no need administration for "out of the box" use. Web interface and Eclipse plug-in - you can choose what you like more or use both. Many integrations with other popular tools (GIT, Jenkins,...
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
Feels too complicated, can't truly customize down/remove some fields you don't want
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
