When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Tenable Nessus easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with HCL AppScan overall.
AppScan's thorough scanning capabilities and CI/CD integration streamline security testing. Detailed reporting aids in prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively.
updates are slow and it has been also slow updates on most of the time
I really like the way it look for vulnerabilities into the iT environment and helps for the need of quick vulnerability assessment in the different devices and assets.
Does not conform to Mac application uninstall standards. You must piecemeal remove Nessus in subdirectories and becomes a hassle to remove safely. I doubt most people use Terminal to remove software in multiple directions. This lack of care makes Security...
AppScan's thorough scanning capabilities and CI/CD integration streamline security testing. Detailed reporting aids in prioritizing vulnerabilities effectively.
I really like the way it look for vulnerabilities into the iT environment and helps for the need of quick vulnerability assessment in the different devices and assets.
updates are slow and it has been also slow updates on most of the time
Does not conform to Mac application uninstall standards. You must piecemeal remove Nessus in subdirectories and becomes a hassle to remove safely. I doubt most people use Terminal to remove software in multiple directions. This lack of care makes Security...