When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Redis Software easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Redis Software overall.
1. Highly Scalable. 2. Out of the box load balancing. 3. Doing short RangeScans 4. Support for Coprocessors(Server side UDF's) 5. Strong Consistency. 6. Rich set of Filters. 7. Support for storing historical data. 8. Deep Intergration with Hadoop...
Less documentation makes it difficult to debug
The robust data structures that Redis offers are by far my favorite feature. It can be used as a simple key/value store like you would do with Memcached but also allows you to create hash tables to simulate more Mongo-like features as well as lists and...
only one master...not a masterless type cluster, which would be great
1. Highly Scalable. 2. Out of the box load balancing. 3. Doing short RangeScans 4. Support for Coprocessors(Server side UDF's) 5. Strong Consistency. 6. Rich set of Filters. 7. Support for storing historical data. 8. Deep Intergration with Hadoop...
The robust data structures that Redis offers are by far my favorite feature. It can be used as a simple key/value store like you would do with Memcached but also allows you to create hash tables to simulate more Mongo-like features as well as lists and...
Less documentation makes it difficult to debug
only one master...not a masterless type cluster, which would be great