Compare GraphQL and Neo4j Graph Database 
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 7.7, allowing for complex relationships and structures, while GraphQL, although powerful for querying, does not inherently provide a data modeling framework, which can lead to challenges in structuring data effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's query language is user-friendly, scoring 8.2, making it easier for developers to write complex queries, whereas GraphQL's syntax can be more challenging for those unfamiliar with its structure, leading to a steeper learning curve.
- G2 users highlight Neo4j's strong performance in data replication and backup and recovery features, which are crucial for maintaining data integrity, while GraphQL lacks built-in data management capabilities, requiring additional tools for these functions.
- Users on G2 appreciate Neo4j's quality of support, scoring 8.5, indicating a responsive and helpful support team, whereas GraphQL has received mixed reviews regarding support, with some users feeling that documentation could be improved.
- Reviewers say that Neo4j shines in its ability to handle complex queries efficiently, with a query optimization score of 7.3, while GraphQL's performance can vary significantly based on how queries are structured, which can lead to inefficiencies if not managed properly.
- Users report that Neo4j's security features, including role-based authorization and authentication, score well at 8.0, providing robust security measures, while GraphQL's security relies heavily on the underlying API and can be less straightforward to implement securely.
- console.neo4j.io
Effortless testing And implementation for the backend developer who is using the graphql
A few significant drawbacks of using GraphQl are as- 1. No proper documentation is available for persons trying to do hands-on. 2. It is not powerful while developing a structure for a client-server-based application (RPC) 3. It has an inferior URL...
I started using Neo4J to represent various facilities ( of a startup that I work at) across the city as nodes and represent their relationships in terms of mode of commute available and the associated costs. The brilliant thing about Neo4J, or graph DB...
The tooling itself was an issue. We used the neo4j ruby bindings to create an embedded neo4j database in rails. This required us to use jruby instead of regular ruby. Using jruby created a lot of other issues with compatibility with the various gems out...
Effortless testing And implementation for the backend developer who is using the graphql
I started using Neo4J to represent various facilities ( of a startup that I work at) across the city as nodes and represent their relationships in terms of mode of commute available and the associated costs. The brilliant thing about Neo4J, or graph DB...
A few significant drawbacks of using GraphQl are as- 1. No proper documentation is available for persons trying to do hands-on. 2. It is not powerful while developing a structure for a client-server-based application (RPC) 3. It has an inferior URL...
The tooling itself was an issue. We used the neo4j ruby bindings to create an embedded neo4j database in rails. This required us to use jruby instead of regular ruby. Using jruby created a lot of other issues with compatibility with the various gems out...
