Compare GNU Automake and GNU Make 
- Users report that GNU Make has a steeper learning curve, with an ease of use score of 6.9, while GNU Automake is praised for its user-friendly interface, scoring 8.3 in this area. Reviewers mention that Automake's abstraction layer simplifies the build process for new users.
- Reviewers say that GNU Make excels in flexibility and control over the build process, allowing for complex customizations, whereas users on G2 highlight that GNU Automake automates many of these tasks, making it easier for users who prefer a more guided approach.
- G2 users mention that GNU Make has a higher rating for meeting requirements at 9.4, indicating it is often better suited for complex projects, while GNU Automake, with a score of 8.9, is seen as more suitable for standard projects where ease of use is prioritized.
- Users say that GNU Make's setup process can be cumbersome, reflected in its score of 6.9 for ease of setup, while GNU Automake is noted for its straightforward installation and configuration, making it a preferred choice for those looking to get started quickly.
- Reviewers mention that both products have solid support, but GNU Automake edges out with a quality of support score of 7.9 compared to GNU Make's 7.5, indicating that users find Automake's support resources slightly more helpful.
- Users report that GNU Make is favored in enterprise environments due to its robust capabilities, while GNU Automake is more popular among small businesses, as indicated by its largest market segment of 54.5% of reviews, suggesting it is tailored for simpler, smaller-scale projects.
Make and Makefiles are the historical build system for Unix. Because it is open to any build tool, it is still a relevant standard today. However, to much boilerplate is needed, and Automake, a translator for extended Makefiles, takes care of this. Since...
I dont have anything to say I dislike as I am still learning to use the tool
I always works as advertised, and there is a tremendous amount of community knowledge about its characteristics and idiosyncrasies.
Documentation is cumbersome and advanced features are plentiful, making it even more of a pain to optimize and efficiently use make.
Make and Makefiles are the historical build system for Unix. Because it is open to any build tool, it is still a relevant standard today. However, to much boilerplate is needed, and Automake, a translator for extended Makefiles, takes care of this. Since...
I always works as advertised, and there is a tremendous amount of community knowledge about its characteristics and idiosyncrasies.
I dont have anything to say I dislike as I am still learning to use the tool
Documentation is cumbersome and advanced features are plentiful, making it even more of a pain to optimize and efficiently use make.
