Compare GitLab and StackHawk 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$42.00 1 Code Contributor Per Month
GitLab
Star Rating
(823)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabStackHawk
Star Rating
(67)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$42.00 1 Code Contributor Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9.4, allowing seamless connectivity with various tools, while StackHawk, with a score of 9.0, offers solid integration options but lacks the extensive flexibility that GitLab provides.
- Reviewers mention that StackHawk shines in Quality of Support, scoring 9.3, which is notably higher than GitLab's 8.5. Users appreciate StackHawk's responsive customer service and detailed documentation, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- G2 users highlight GitLab's superior Reporting and Analytics capabilities, scoring 9.4 compared to StackHawk's 8.3. Reviewers say that GitLab's dashboards provide comprehensive insights into project performance, which is crucial for tracking progress and making data-driven decisions.
- Users on G2 report that StackHawk has a better False Positives rate, scoring 9.2, while GitLab's score is lower at 7.6. Reviewers mention that StackHawk's scanning tools are more accurate, reducing the noise and allowing teams to focus on genuine vulnerabilities.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, which is slightly lower than StackHawk's 9.1. Users appreciate StackHawk's intuitive interface that simplifies the user experience, making it easier for teams to adopt the software without extensive training.
- Users say that GitLab's Deployment Automation features are robust, scoring 9.0, which allows for efficient CI/CD processes. In contrast, StackHawk, while offering automation, scores lower at 8.8, indicating that GitLab may provide a more comprehensive solution for teams focused on continuous deployment.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Axify
(4)
Continuous Integration
Visit Website
Sponsored
OX Security
(48)
Continuous Integration
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableStackHawk
Pro
$42.00
1 Code Contributor Per Month
StackHawks Pro plan offers unlimited scans and environments for up to 50 applications. Email and Slack based support included.
- Unlimited scans and environments
- Unlimited applications
- Docker based application security scanner
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
StackHawk
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
613
8.8
51
Ease of Use
8.7
615
9.1
51
Ease of Setup
8.5
175
8.4
31
Ease of Admin
8.6
160
8.9
29
Quality of Support
8.5
481
9.3
48
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
135
9.2
26
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
581
9.4
40
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
117
Not enough data
8.9
125
Not enough data
8.6
117
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.5
104
Not enough data
8.7
109
Not enough data
8.6
98
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
126
Not enough data
9.0
115
Not enough data
8.7
115
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.4
11
Analysis
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Testing
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Administration
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
21
8.9
27
8.7
21
8.6
26
Analysis
8.3
20
8.3
30
9.2
20
8.3
26
8.8
20
Feature Not Available
8.8
20
9.1
29
8.8
20
Feature Not Available
Testing
8.6
19
7.3
27
9.1
19
8.8
29
9.0
18
8.0
27
9.0
17
8.5
26
8.9
16
8.2
29
9.2
17
7.4
29
Administration
8.8
72
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.7
70
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
Automation
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.4
67
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.7
68
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
69
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.6
66
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
25
Network
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Application
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
18
Functionality
8.8
187
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
8.6
180
Not enough data
Management
8.7
174
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.9
180
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
121
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
123
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.8
120
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.7
62
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.1
8
Security Testing
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.3
10
Security Management
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Management
8.8
122
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.7
119
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
131
Not enough data
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
199
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
187
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
181
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
189
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
193
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
174
|
Verified
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
8.4
104
Not enough data
Security
8.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
92
Not enough data
8.9
101
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
37
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.8
35
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and StackHawk are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
StackHawk
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
4.1%
Financial Services
3.6%
Computer & Network Security
2.4%
Other
33.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Computer Software
17.2%
Computer & Network Security
9.4%
Financial Services
4.7%
Banking
4.7%
Other
40.6%
Most Helpful Reviews
GitLab
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Willian M.
Verified User in Internet
The community edition is really great. Today we have a community edition installation at the company I'm working for and it works like a charm.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Rahul G.
Verified User in Computer Software
i didn't like UI it can be improved in my opinion
StackHawk
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Viktor H.
Verified User in Construction
The onboarding process to get the tests running is very helpful. The StackHawk employees take the time if you have questions, and they are very willing to help. I like the technology of the test tool.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Willian M.
Verified User in Internet
The community edition is really great. Today we have a community edition installation at the company I'm working for and it works like a charm.
Viktor H.
Verified User in Construction
The onboarding process to get the tests running is very helpful. The StackHawk employees take the time if you have questions, and they are very willing to help. I like the technology of the test tool.
Rahul G.
Verified User in Computer Software
i didn't like UI it can be improved in my opinion
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
StackHawk has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
