Compare GitLab and Indusface WAS 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$59.00
GitLab
Star Rating
(823)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabIndusface WAS
Star Rating
(62)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its issue tracking capabilities, scoring a 9.1, which reviewers mention helps teams stay organized and on top of tasks effectively. In contrast, Indusface WAS also performs well with a score of 9.2, but some users feel it lacks the same level of integration with project management tools.
- Reviewers mention that Indusface WAS shines in quality of support, achieving a score of 9.3, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. GitLab, while still strong at 8.5, has received feedback indicating that response times can vary.
- G2 users highlight GitLab's deployment automation features, scoring 9.0, which reviewers say streamline the CI/CD process significantly. Indusface WAS, with a score of 9.0 as well, is noted for its robust compliance testing, but some users feel it could improve in deployment flexibility.
- Users on G2 report that GitLab's extensibility is a standout feature, scoring 8.7, allowing for seamless integration with various third-party applications. In comparison, Indusface WAS scores higher at 9.4, with users mentioning its strong API capabilities that enhance customization options.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's ease of use is a significant advantage, with a score of 8.7, making it accessible for teams of all sizes. Indusface WAS, while slightly higher at 8.9, has received comments about a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users say that GitLab's reporting and analytics features, scoring 8.9, provide valuable insights into project performance, which many find essential for decision-making. Indusface WAS, with a score of 9.4, is praised for its detailed vulnerability scan reports, but some users feel it could benefit from more user-friendly dashboards.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Axify
(4)
Vulnerability Management
Visit Website
Sponsored
OX Security
(48)
Vulnerability Management
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableIndusface WAS
Advance Plan
$59.00
- AcuRisQ - Get a List of Prioritised Vulnerabilities that Pose the Highest Business Risk
- Managed Application Security Scanning
- Scan Behind Authentication Page
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Indusface WAS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
613
9.0
47
Ease of Use
8.7
615
8.9
46
Ease of Setup
8.5
175
8.9
30
Ease of Admin
8.6
160
8.9
25
Quality of Support
8.5
481
9.4
43
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
135
9.3
23
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
581
8.6
43
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
117
Not enough data
8.9
125
Not enough data
8.6
117
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.5
104
Not enough data
8.7
109
Not enough data
8.6
98
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
126
Not enough data
9.0
115
Not enough data
8.7
115
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
8.9
28
Analysis
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
9.3
28
Testing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.6
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.3
24
Administration
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
21
Feature Not Available
8.7
21
Feature Not Available
Analysis
8.3
20
9.4
15
9.2
20
9.4
15
8.8
20
Feature Not Available
8.8
20
9.4
16
8.8
20
Feature Not Available
Testing
8.6
19
9.5
14
9.1
19
9.5
13
9.0
18
9.4
12
9.0
17
9.4
13
8.9
16
9.4
14
9.2
17
8.5
14
Administration
8.8
72
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.7
70
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
Automation
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.4
67
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.7
68
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
69
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.6
66
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.1
28
Not enough data
7.8
27
Not enough data
9.3
29
Network
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Application
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
25
Functionality
8.8
187
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
8.6
180
Not enough data
Management
8.7
174
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.9
180
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
121
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
123
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.8
120
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.7
62
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Management
8.8
122
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.7
119
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
131
Not enough data
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
199
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
187
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
181
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
189
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
193
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
174
|
Verified
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
8.4
104
Not enough data
Security
8.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
92
Not enough data
8.9
101
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
37
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.8
35
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Indusface WAS are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Indusface WAS is categorized as Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, and Vulnerability Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Indusface WAS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
4.1%
Financial Services
3.6%
Computer & Network Security
2.4%
Other
33.0%
Computer Software
25.9%
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Financial Services
8.6%
Computer & Network Security
6.9%
Telecommunications
3.4%
Other
34.5%
Most Helpful Reviews
GitLab
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Daniel B.
Verified User in Public Policy
The built-in features of Auto DevOps have made our experience more rewarding and effective.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Very slow in general, a lot of failures and outages.
Indusface WAS
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
Onboarding for the trail was so smooth. Even follow-up from the team was very proactive to start.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Mark L.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
I think the graphical user interface/dashboard could use a new high-tech futuristic display, not like the current dashboard, your product is state-of-the-art technology but the dashboard looks like it's for a child.
Daniel B.
Verified User in Public Policy
The built-in features of Auto DevOps have made our experience more rewarding and effective.
Verified User in Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
Onboarding for the trail was so smooth. Even follow-up from the team was very proactive to start.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Very slow in general, a lot of failures and outages.
Mark L.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
I think the graphical user interface/dashboard could use a new high-tech futuristic display, not like the current dashboard, your product is state-of-the-art technology but the dashboard looks like it's for a child.
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Indusface WAS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
