Compare Git and Subversion 
- Users report that Git's branching and merging capabilities are superior, allowing for more flexible workflows, while Subversion's linear approach can be limiting for complex projects.
- Reviewers mention that Git's distributed version control system enables better collaboration among teams, especially in remote settings, whereas Subversion's centralized model can create bottlenecks in team interactions.
- G2 users highlight that Git's ease of setup is a strong point, with many praising the intuitive command-line interface, while users on G2 note that Subversion's setup can be more cumbersome and less user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that Git's quality of support is often rated higher, with many users appreciating the extensive community resources and documentation available, compared to Subversion, where users report less comprehensive support options.
- Users say that Git's product direction is viewed positively, with frequent updates and new features being rolled out, while Subversion users mention concerns about stagnation and a lack of innovation in recent years.
- Reviewers mention that Git's overall user satisfaction is higher, with a G2 rating of 4.7, reflecting a strong preference among small businesses, while Subversion's rating of 3.9 indicates more mixed feelings, particularly among enterprise users.
The way they structure and record each code
Poor design decisions led to leaking abstractions: * Design decision: "do not record changes, just store snapshots of working copy". Following that leaves no way but to detect file copying/renaming (using their contents' hashes). It is fine until user...
it tracks and provide end to end visibilty of each commit by developer.Also the hooks provide easy way for notification to be sent to IT leads whenever any change is being commit , also the delta changes can be tracked very easily.
Since you maintain a "working copy" on your desktop, I've broken the fragile link between the desktop app and the online repository. I've broken Subversion about every way possible, and learned how to manually remove the "sync" feature for the folders in my...
The way they structure and record each code
it tracks and provide end to end visibilty of each commit by developer.Also the hooks provide easy way for notification to be sent to IT leads whenever any change is being commit , also the delta changes can be tracked very easily.
Poor design decisions led to leaking abstractions: * Design decision: "do not record changes, just store snapshots of working copy". Following that leaves no way but to detect file copying/renaming (using their contents' hashes). It is fine until user...
Since you maintain a "working copy" on your desktop, I've broken the fragile link between the desktop app and the online repository. I've broken Subversion about every way possible, and learned how to manually remove the "sync" feature for the folders in my...
