Compare Git Tower and SourceTree 
- Reviewers mention that Git Tower excels in its user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners to navigate and utilize Git functionalities effectively, while SourceTree's interface can be overwhelming for new users.
- Users report that Git Tower's "Visual History" feature provides a clear and intuitive way to visualize changes, which enhances understanding of project history, whereas SourceTree's history view is often described as less intuitive.
- G2 users highlight Git Tower's superior customer support, noting that the response times are quicker and more helpful compared to SourceTree, where users have reported longer wait times and less satisfactory support experiences.
- Users on G2 appreciate Git Tower's seamless integration with various platforms, such as GitHub and Bitbucket, which simplifies workflows, while SourceTree users mention occasional issues with integration that can disrupt their processes.
- Reviewers say that Git Tower's "Stash" feature is particularly well-implemented, allowing for easy management of changes, while SourceTree's stashing functionality is seen as less straightforward and sometimes confusing.
- Users report that Git Tower's consistent updates and improvements reflect a strong product direction, with many praising the regular addition of new features, whereas SourceTree users have expressed concerns about the pace of updates and feature enhancements.
- Easy to see stage or discard individual lines - Easy to see what's going on - Auto stash/restore when switching branches - CMD+Z is a godlike feature - Rare operations are a lot more intuitive than GIT flags - Reflog explorer (but you really don't...
Many will stick with the free version of git as it gets the job done. Unfortunately, it's also not better or maybe only slightly better than Sourcetree. Sourcetree customers will not switch to git tower.
Gives you a graphical interface for performing version control operations
To me the code merge feels not so intuitive and difficult to perform. I take backup and discard local files and get new files and do the merge manually.
- Easy to see stage or discard individual lines - Easy to see what's going on - Auto stash/restore when switching branches - CMD+Z is a godlike feature - Rare operations are a lot more intuitive than GIT flags - Reflog explorer (but you really don't...
Gives you a graphical interface for performing version control operations
Many will stick with the free version of git as it gets the job done. Unfortunately, it's also not better or maybe only slightly better than Sourcetree. Sourcetree customers will not switch to git tower.
To me the code merge feels not so intuitive and difficult to perform. I take backup and discard local files and get new files and do the merge manually.
