Compare Git Tower and GitLens 
- Users report that Git Tower excels in its user-friendly interface, making it easy for beginners to navigate and utilize Git functionalities effectively, while GitLens is praised for its powerful integration with Visual Studio Code, providing advanced features for experienced developers.
- Reviewers mention that Git Tower's visual commit history and drag-and-drop functionality simplify the process of managing branches and commits, whereas GitLens offers detailed blame annotations and code lens features that enhance code review processes.
- G2 users highlight that Git Tower's support for multiple repositories in a single window is a significant advantage for small businesses managing various projects, while GitLens is favored for its robust inline documentation and insights that help mid-market teams understand code changes better.
- Users on G2 say that Git Tower's seamless integration with popular platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket is a strong point, but GitLens users appreciate its ability to provide contextual information directly within the code editor, which aids in faster decision-making.
- Reviewers mention that Git Tower's ease of setup and intuitive design contribute to a smoother onboarding experience, while GitLens is noted for its extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor their development environment to their specific needs.
- Users report that both products have high-quality support, but GitLens users particularly value the active community and extensive documentation available, which helps them troubleshoot issues more effectively compared to Git Tower's support resources.
- Easy to see stage or discard individual lines - Easy to see what's going on - Auto stash/restore when switching branches - CMD+Z is a godlike feature - Rare operations are a lot more intuitive than GIT flags - Reflog explorer (but you really don't...
Many will stick with the free version of git as it gets the job done. Unfortunately, it's also not better or maybe only slightly better than Sourcetree. Sourcetree customers will not switch to git tower.
Really helps to compare the code, giving insights to the whole timeline of even a single stack, line or even letter of code changed. Helped me in understanding and for peer review through it. Code versioning also becomes easy through it. Very helpful...
To work on this extension as a team, it is necessary to do it in a very coordinated way, as some changes can "overwrite" those of a colleague if not done properly.
- Easy to see stage or discard individual lines - Easy to see what's going on - Auto stash/restore when switching branches - CMD+Z is a godlike feature - Rare operations are a lot more intuitive than GIT flags - Reflog explorer (but you really don't...
Really helps to compare the code, giving insights to the whole timeline of even a single stack, line or even letter of code changed. Helped me in understanding and for peer review through it. Code versioning also becomes easy through it. Very helpful...
Many will stick with the free version of git as it gets the job done. Unfortunately, it's also not better or maybe only slightly better than Sourcetree. Sourcetree customers will not switch to git tower.
To work on this extension as a team, it is necessary to do it in a very coordinated way, as some changes can "overwrite" those of a colleague if not done properly.
