- Home
- ...
- Other Web Frameworks Software
- Font Awesome
- Material Design for Bootstrap
- Font Awesome-vs-Material Design for Bootstrap
Compare Font Awesome and Material Design for Bootstrap 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (67.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Font Awesome
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (67.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Font AwesomeMaterial Design for Bootstrap
Star Rating
(24)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Material Design for BootstrapSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Material Design for Bootstrap excels in its intuitive design and user-friendly interface, with a G2 rating of 9.0 for ease of use, while Font Awesome, with a rating of 8.9, is slightly less favored in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Material Design for Bootstrap has a strong focus on responsive design, making it easier for developers to create mobile-friendly applications, whereas Font Awesome is praised for its extensive icon library but lacks some of the responsive features.
- G2 users highlight that Material Design for Bootstrap has a higher rating of 9.2 for meeting requirements, indicating that it aligns well with user needs, while Font Awesome, rated at 8.6, may not fully meet all user expectations in certain scenarios.
- Users on G2 report that Material Design for Bootstrap's product direction is rated at 9.4, suggesting a strong commitment to ongoing improvements and updates, while Font Awesome, with a rating of 9.6, is also seen as forward-thinking but may not have as many recent enhancements.
- Reviewers say that the quality of support for Material Design for Bootstrap is rated at 8.6, which is slightly higher than Font Awesome's 8.5, indicating that users may find better assistance when issues arise with Material Design for Bootstrap.
- Users report that Material Design for Bootstrap has a total of 22 reviews, reflecting a solid user base, while Font Awesome has 32 reviews, suggesting a more extensive community but potentially less focused feedback on specific features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Font Awesome
No pricing availableMaterial Design for Bootstrap
No pricing availableFree Trial
Font Awesome
No trial information availableMaterial Design for Bootstrap
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
28
9.2
19
Ease of Use
8.9
28
9.0
21
Ease of Setup
8.3
7
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
24
8.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
28
9.4
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Font Awesome and Material Design for Bootstrap are categorized as Other Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Font Awesome has no unique categories
Material Design for Bootstrap has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Font Awesome
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Material Design for Bootstrap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
19.4%
Computer Software
16.1%
Design
12.9%
Telecommunications
9.7%
Marketing and Advertising
6.5%
Other
35.5%
Computer Software
28.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
19.0%
Consulting
9.5%
Marketing and Advertising
9.5%
Oil & Energy
4.8%
Other
28.6%
Most Helpful Reviews
Font Awesome
Most Helpful Favorable Review
BP_Alex D.
Verified User in Graphic Design
It is very convient to access icons and add them to your projects!
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Hospitality
It's a little too expensive for our current budget
Material Design for Bootstrap
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Computer Software
The components are well-designed and work great if used properly. Makes the very recognizable bootstrap components look modern and professional. There are a lot of modern elements to use.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Automotive
I wish it was more user-friendly for more visual designers who don't know how to code.
BP_Alex D.
Verified User in Graphic Design
It is very convient to access icons and add them to your projects!
Verified User in Computer Software
The components are well-designed and work great if used properly. Makes the very recognizable bootstrap components look modern and professional. There are a lot of modern elements to use.
Verified User in Hospitality
It's a little too expensive for our current budget
Verified User in Automotive
I wish it was more user-friendly for more visual designers who don't know how to code.
Alternatives
Discussions
Font Awesome has no discussions with answers
Material Design for Bootstrap has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
