Compare FFmpeg and PotPlayer 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (81.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
FFmpeg
Star Rating
(20)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FFmpegPotPlayer
Star Rating
(16)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (81.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PotPlayerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that FFmpeg excels in its versatility, allowing for a wide range of video and audio format conversions, while PotPlayer is praised for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation.
- Reviewers mention that FFmpeg's command-line interface can be daunting for beginners, leading to a lower ease of use rating (6.9), whereas PotPlayer's ease of use rating (9.3) highlights its intuitive design that appeals to casual users.
- G2 users indicate that FFmpeg has a steeper learning curve, particularly in setup (7.4), while PotPlayer is noted for its quick installation and straightforward setup process, making it more accessible for non-technical users.
- Users on G2 report that the quality of support for FFmpeg (6.9) can be inconsistent, as it relies heavily on community forums, whereas PotPlayer users mention a more responsive support system, reflected in its higher support rating (8.1).
- Reviewers say that FFmpeg's product direction (8.6) is strong, with regular updates and improvements, but PotPlayer users report an even more positive outlook (9.0) on its ongoing development and feature enhancements.
- Users report that while both products cater to small businesses, PotPlayer has a larger market segment (81.3% of reviews) indicating a broader appeal, particularly among users looking for a straightforward media player experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
FFmpeg
No pricing availablePotPlayer
No pricing availableFree Trial
FFmpeg
No trial information availablePotPlayer
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.5
17
9.6
15
Ease of Use
6.9
17
9.3
15
Ease of Setup
7.4
7
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
6.9
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.9
9
8.1
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
17
9.0
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
FFmpeg and PotPlayer are categorized as Other Video
Unique Categories
FFmpeg has no unique categories
PotPlayer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
FFmpeg
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PotPlayer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Computer Software
15.8%
Media Production
10.5%
Marketing and Advertising
10.5%
Semiconductors
5.3%
Other
42.1%
Broadcast Media
18.8%
Graphic Design
12.5%
Entertainment
12.5%
Computer Software
12.5%
Media Production
6.3%
Other
37.5%
Most Helpful Reviews
FFmpeg
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Oksana T.
Verified User in Industrial Automation
Command Line Interface : ffmpeg , ffprobe
Most Helpful Critical Review
Ameya T.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Lack of application framework features is something that ffmpeg can improve on. But I think gstreamer is a much better multimedia framework Not having an object oriented wrapper around it is also they can work on.
PotPlayer
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Bahareh J.
Verified User in Entertainment
It is really one of the best media players that you can use on your system. You can watch videos and listen audios in different formats, with the best possible quality in video and audio. The software can manage files from your system and also internet....
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Computer Hardware
I Need more plugin for the player and times
Oksana T.
Verified User in Industrial Automation
Command Line Interface : ffmpeg , ffprobe
Bahareh J.
Verified User in Entertainment
It is really one of the best media players that you can use on your system. You can watch videos and listen audios in different formats, with the best possible quality in video and audio. The software can manage files from your system and also internet....
Ameya T.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Lack of application framework features is something that ffmpeg can improve on. But I think gstreamer is a much better multimedia framework Not having an object oriented wrapper around it is also they can work on.
Verified User in Computer Hardware
I Need more plugin for the player and times
Alternatives
Discussions
Why do you need FFmpeg?
1 comment
AT
I have more options and control on video compression, especially when small file sizes are really needed.Read more
FFmpeg has no more discussions with answers
I have heard about live stream on potlayer. How can I use it?
7 comments
SC
Welcome to the world of live streaming! As technology advances, new ways of communication and entertainment are constantly emerging. One of the most popular...Read more
How can I use PotPlayer for video streaming?
1 comment
YT
If you have used KM Player software. It also looks exactly the same. But the playerpot is much more professionalRead more
How to output 3D via "HDMI 1.4"?
1 comment
SR
To output 3D content from PotPlayer via HDMI 1.4, you will need to make sure that your graphics card and display device support 3D playback and are connected...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy